IT took a 15-year-old from Glasgow to put the five middle-aged men vying to become the next Prime Minister firmly in their place.
Climate striker Erin, who was picked from thousands of applicants to ask a question of the remaining candidates in the Tory leadership contest during last night’s BBC debate, urged them to make the environment their “top priority if elected”.
“Will you commit to net-zero carbon emissions by 2025?” she asked.
READ MORE: The Sketch: Clown car v wild card in Tory leadership debate
Last week, outgoing Prime Minister Theresa May signed her party up to target net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.
Host Emily Maitlis asked the five men to raise their hands if they would agree to Erin’s demands.
None of them did.
“I’m going to commit to putting the environment at the centre of my programme” said Boris Johnson.
Rory Stewart said he would like to make the UK the “leader in the world in driving green and environmental change”. But, he added, it has to be done in a way that’s “honest”.
Gove thanked the girl for her activism, though added that he wished the strikers hadn’t missed school.
Jeremy Hunt said “it was good of Erin to challenge us to be ambitious” but added that he would only commit himself to net zero by 2050 target
already in place.
Johnson was then asked if he would, as prime minister, stop Heathrow’s expansion.
The former foreign secretary, and frontrunner in the contest, had previously said he would lie down in front of bulldozers to stop the building of the third runway, but when the Commons came to make a decision, he was out of the country in Afghanistan.
“I continue to have grave reservations about the Heathrow runway three,” he hummed,
Pushed on it again, he said there were court cases now proceeding, and “as Prime Minister I will be following those very closely indeed.”
When Erin was asked which of the candidates had impressed her the most she replied: “Well, to be honest, none of you have really impressed me in the way that I’m looking for.
“Climate change isn’t an issue of tomorrow, it’s an issue of today and we need to take drastic critical action and I don’t think any of you are willing to offer that, so, thank you.”
Elsewhere in the debate, Sajid Javid caught his rivals on the hop when he bounced them in to backing an independent inquiry into Islamophobia in the Tory party.
Last month, the Muslim Council of Britain called on the UK’s human rights watchdog to probe the party, saying the “problem of Islamophobia” ran “deep” in the Tories.
“Do we all agree? Shall we all have an external investigation into Islamophobia?” he asked.
Stunned, the other four nodded their heads.
There was also agreement between all five that there would be an early general election.
Johnson, who in 2007 called Gordon Brown “arrogant” for not going to the country when he replaced Tony Blair, said it was a different situation now as whoever became the next prime minister would be taking over at a time of crisis.
Hunt said there could be no election until after Brexit, while Stewart said there could be no vote until the Tories had won back the trust of the people.
The contest continues today, with MPs voting again to whittle the field down. At least one of the five will be eliminated.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel