CAMPAIGNERS have called for a parliamentary inquiry over royal spending after it emerged that £2.4m of taxpayers' money was spent on refurbishing the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's home.
Anti monarchy group Republic, which campaigns for an elected head of state, questioned why the funds had been "thrown" at Meghan and Harry's Frogmore Cottage residence while public services were under financial pressure.
Frogmore Cottage, which was previously five separate residences, has been turned into a single home for the newlywed couple.
The multimillion-pound bill was revealed as part of the annual accounts for the Sovereign Grant, which funds the Queen and her household’s official expenses, show the monarchy cost the taxpayer £67m during 2018-19 – an increase of almost £20m on the previous financial year
“The works started on-site in November 2018 and were substantially completed by the end of March 2019,” the latest Sovereign Grant accounts said.
Graham Smith, from Republic, said: "An MP spending taxpayers' money on a private home would probably not be an MP for much longer.
"The general funds of the Treasury should not be spent on individual members of the royal family at all – even if we had all the money to spend on public services it should not be happening.
"The point about public services is it is particularly galling that they're allowed to get away this whilst public services need money."
Smith said Republic would be asking its supporters to write to MPs to urge them to launch an inquiry into the issue of spending on the royal family.
Kensington Palace had previously insisted reports that the renovation works would cost between £2m and £3m were too high, with the estimates closer to £1.5m.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel