UNIONISTS have long rejected the term “Project Fear” being attached to their anti-independence campaigns.
But the latest warning is nothing if not scary.
Beware: if Scotland becomes independent, it will not “survive”.
That shock revelation come courtesy of this week’s episode of Jeremy Vine on Channel 5.
Panellists discussed reports that Gordon Brown has warned if Boris Johnson becomes Prime Minister support for independence could surge.
Paul Burrell, Princes Diana’s former butler, says the report is “food” for Nicola Sturgeon before displaying his intimate knowledge of Scotland’s constitutional debate.
“She [Sturgeon] would love to read this this morning, that Scotland will have devolution.” The Jouker suspects the First Minister may have been made aware of that some time ago.
Burrell continues: “I think that the United Kingdom is stronger together than they are apart. I mean, for goodness sake, Scotland, by itself? How’s it going survive? It has … what does it have? … Oil, and a monster in a lake … and … whisky.”
READ: Transcript of what was said in THAT Jeremy Vine episode about Scotland
Despite his unparalleled understanding of Scotland, Burrell was humble enough to allow interjections from his fellow panellists to finish off the list of Scotland’s assets.
Glamour model Nicola McLean added Irn-Bru into the mix.
Scottish co-host Storm Huntley, who was the one to initially suggest whisky, was on hand to suggest wind power, shortbread, tartan and bagpipes.
At this point, keen to balance the argument, Vine asks a Scottish audience member if the nation can survive on its own.
“No” comes the answer – delivering a blow for pro-independence activists, who seemingly face the prospect of seeing their country disintegrate into dust if a majority of people put a tick next to the word Yes on a ballot paper.
Moving on to what is obviously the most important issue among all this, Burrell points out that Scottish independence “would hurt the Queen”.
Vine points out that the whole independence debate might not be about finances, but simply a desire to have “your country back”.
READ MORE: Amy Macdonald in furious Twitter rant at ridiculous Unionist claim
This is dismissed out of hand by panellist Carole Malone.
“The figures now for staying within the Union are higher now than they were at the time of the referendum. So no, people don’t want to leave [the UK].”
This really has to be seen to be believed.
— Sarah Mackie (@lumi_1984) June 25, 2019
'I mean for goodness sakes...Scotland, by itself? How is it going to survive?'
The Jeremy Vine show on Channel 5, 25th June 2019.
Part 1/2: pic.twitter.com/BYXOSbSCv8
Perhaps unsurprisingly for someone who could not think of a single asset in Scotland, Malone seems to have mixed up her figures slightly.
A YouGov poll for the Times at the end of April, for instance, found 49% of voters backed independence. And a Panelbase survey published last week showed that figure jumps to 53% if the overwhelming favourite Johnson becomes PM.
READ MORE: Expert pollster: No-deal Johnson would give Scotland independence majority
Unencumbered by pesky facts, Malone moves on to reject notions that Johnson does not care about Scotland, as host Vine points out he has no recollection of the Tory leadership frontrunner ever mentioning the country.
But back to Burrell, who renews his plea to Scots.
“I wouldn’t like to see them [Scots] detached from the UK. I think they belong to the UK and that they’re better off being part of it.”
But Burrell does not even have seem to have even convinced himself that his comments would not fair well under scrutiny.
“Don’t shout at me,” he adds nervously when Vine points out Scottish viewers may have a bone to pick.
Judging by the reaction on Twitter, they certainly did.
SNP defence spokesperson Stewart McDonald said the attack had backfired.
We really should thank @JeremyVineOn5 for providing @YesScot with excellent campaign clips 🏴👍🏻 https://t.co/jHMS9MJAT0
— Stewart McDonald MP (@StewartMcDonald) June 26, 2019
National columnist Alistair Heather also struggled to comprehend the logic of Unionists.
He tweeted: “It boggles the mind that on the one hand they are all in favour of keeping a hold of us because it makes them "stronger", but on the other hand have no idea what goes on here, or in what way we might be a positive asset to their tiny empire.”
READ: Transcript of what was said in THAT Jeremy Vine episode about Scotland
But Actor Iain Robertson was impressed with Burrell’s credentials.
When looking for an informed opinion on Scottish independence, I always check in with ...
— Iain Robertson (@IainR0bertson) June 25, 2019
*squints at notes*
... Princess Diana's former butler 😐 https://t.co/NTi2WWlWpy
SNP MP Philippa Whitford was blown away by the anti-independence arguments.
Just WOW! https://t.co/lSSHEE3sC0
— Dr Philippa Whitford (@Dr_PhilippaW) June 25, 2019
Author JR Tomlin was similarly downbeat about Scotland’s assets.
True. Scotland does not export any whisky, any gin, any electricity, any salmon and other food and drink, has no game industry, does not have the largest satellite industry in Europe. Wait. They have all of that but definitely cannot survive without England sending them up food.
— J. R. Tomlin (Vile Yank Cybernat) (@JRTomlinAuthor) June 25, 2019
It wasn't just Scots who were outraged.
One Twitter user said: "I'm English. I've just watched this and I can honestly say Scotland should get the f*** out of the UK and save itself because the UK has been taken over by vacuum headed idiots where this serves as a sorry example of debate. I apologise to Scotland for this utter ignorance."
But the comments didn't end there.
Yip, Scotland 🏴 this is how we are viewed by some (we have a net trade surplus, oil, gas, whisky, food, engineering, drink, medical sciences, tourism financial services, renewables, surplus water, 5 of the top 200 Uni’s in the world & so much more) @theJeremyVine https://t.co/FErLSvIHU2
— Kenny Anderson (@Kennyaberdeen) June 25, 2019
Excruciating, toe curling watch. @JeremyVineOn5 Princess Diana’s butler and Carol Malone decide the Loch Ness monster is an impediment to Scottish eindependence. Where’s @Matthew_Wright when you need him? https://t.co/K8VaoQFMDa
— JOHN NICOLSON (@MrJohnNicolson) June 26, 2019
At this stage a reckon we could survive solely off of hatred of the Jeremy Vine show. https://t.co/xT6Uh95fP4
— The Daily Gael (@DailyGael) June 25, 2019
This teally does have to be watched
— Ron Dickinson (@ron_dickinson) June 25, 2019
The arrogance is breathtaking
Absolute incredulity that Scotland could "survive"
"I mean, what have they GOT?"
Time is coming when we will bloody well show them
Now IS the time to say #Yes2 #DissolveTheUnion https://t.co/EbCnHbqiUG
They have gall to think Scots are stupid - we are if prepared to put up with any more of this tripe. Should be put on a loop & broadcast perpetually, 24 hrs a day, to every home in Scotland https://t.co/nRcmZxoYcK
— JimFairlie (@JimFairlie) June 25, 2019
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel