CHANNEL 5 has issued a response to complaints over a discussion on the Jeremy Vine show of Scottish independence.
Panellists were addressing a newspaper report on former prime minister Gordon Brown saying support for Scottish independence would surge if Boris Johnson won the Tory leadership contest.
Paul Burrell, Princess Diana’s former butler, said the article was "food" for Nicola Sturgeon, and that the UK is stronger together.
He continued: "I mean, for goodness' sake, Scotland, by itself? How is it going to survive? What does it have? Oil and a monster in a lake."
READ MORE: Transcript of what was said in THAT Jeremy Vine episode about Scotland
Model Nicola McLean and Scottish co-host Storm Huntley also suggested Irn Bru, whisky, wind power, shortbread, tartan and bagpipes as other options.
Vine asked a Scottish audience member if the country could survive on its own, and received a one-word reply of "no".
Current affairs commentator Carole Malone dismissed the suggestion that Scottish people wanted to leave the Union.
She said: "Every time they do a poll it says that the figures now for staying within the union are higher than they were at the time of the referendum."
This was untrue, with a YouGov poll for the Times at the end of April finding 49% support for a Yes vote. A Panelbase survey published last week showed 53% would want independence if Johnson become PM.
Now, Channel 5 has responded to criticism of the show from Scottish viewers.
A spokesperson for Jeremy Vine on 5 said: "Questions about Scottish independence come up regularly on the programme, reflecting a broad range of views.
"The comments made by Paul Burrell were in the context of our daily ‘stories of the day’ segment in which one of the dozen articles being discussed was from the Daily Mail and headlined ‘UK could split apart if Boris becomes PM warns (Gordon) Brown’.
"As with all panellists, the views Paul expressed are personal to him and do not reflect those of the show.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel