ONE of the SNP’s most high-profile MPs of recent years, Joanna Cherry QC, has been cleared of allegations of bullying and condoning bullying by a member of her staff.
Famous for her forensic dismantling of Transport Minister Chris Grayling over the Seaborne Freight scandal, Cherry was faced two months ago with a single formal complaint to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards.
All the dealings of the Commissioner’s office are private and confidential but due to a precedent set in another case, Cherry was given leave to issue a two-sentence statement confirming that she had been cleared.
Cherry stated: “I’m pleased to be able to advise that I have been exonerated after an independent investigation into complaints that I had either condoned or been engaged in bullying within my constituency office. As I predicted, the allegations have not been upheld.”
The allegations were made by a former caseworker who accused Cherry of condoning “bullying” by her office manager and of being “a bully” herself.
Newspaper reports at the time stated there were four complaints against Cherry but only one complainant took the matter up with the Standards Commissioner.
READ MORE: Joanna Cherry hits out at smear campaign and calls for SNP unity
It is understood that Cherry provided evidence that no such bullying took place in her office or by her office staff, although The National can reveal that there was “a difference of opinion,” as one source put it, over staff timekeeping in particular.
The allegations were particularly hurtful to Cherry, 53, who is the SNP spokesperson on justice in the Commons. She said she was “not and never has been a bully”.
They also came at a time when Cherry had been given police protection after a series of death threats were made against her on social media. She also went public on her feelings
that she was the victim of “smear tactics” due to “infighting” within the SNP – there has been evidence of some members being upset at Cherry’s rise to prominence and she is known to be a friend of former First Minister Alex Salmond who is currently facing charges relating to alleged sex offences.
The fact that the complaint was released to the media angered Cherry most of all. Many of her colleagues in the SNP parliamentary group stood by her, while First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, below, said that Cherry was “a massive asset” to the party.
It is no secret that there are ongoing disputes within the SNP over the second independence referendum and tactics in relation to Brexit, but all sides recognise the effectiveness of Cherry as a formidable debater.
READ MORE: AUOB march to go ahead amid rally concern
A friend of Cherry’s told The National: “This has been an awful couple of months for Joanna, especially as she has been one of the most effective speakers in the House against the Tories’ Brexit madness.
“Her many friends in the party will be delighted at this news and now she can concentrate on what she does best, which is using her lawyer’s brain to take on this wicked Government.”
An SNP spokesperson said: “It is absolutely right that any complaint from staff is properly assessed by the relevant authorities to allow a conclusion to be reached.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel