Boris Johnson has been urged to rule out scrapping the Barnett formula, as he was accused of dodging questions over its future.
The Tory leadership candidate's views on the formula, which allocates public spending increases to the Scottish Parliament, have been under scrutiny as the race to succeed Theresa May in Number 10 nears its conclusion.
In 2014, a day after the Scottish independence referendum, Johnson indicated that he would be in favour of a redesigned funding model.
The Conservative MP made the comments after the late Labour peer Joel Barnett, who devised the formula, said that it was unfair.
"We can't just go on with a system that even Joel Barnett himself thinks is outdated," Johnson said in 2014.
"There's a good way of honouring this odd promise. Ask Lord Barnett who has disassociated himself from this formula to get on with redesigning it.
"He said, Lord Barnett said himself, it was a crazy and outdated to continue to funnel money in this way.
"If he thinks so then I'm sure everybody else south of the Border thinks so. It's my solution for honouring what is a slightly reckless promise."
A spokesman for Jeremy Hunt said: "The Barnett formula is essential to protect Scotland's public services. That's why a government run by Jeremy would maintain it, to help ensure Scotland's schools and hospitals get the funding they need."
Scottish Conservative MP John Lamont, campaign manager in Scotland and one of Jeremy Hunt's original backers in his bid to become prime minister, said that it would be "reckless" to scrap the formula.
He said: "Boris is already refusing to debate Jeremy. He shouldn't dodge questions on the Barnett formula too.
"This shouldn't even be a difficult question. There is no case for scrapping the Barnett formula. The only other people who want to get rid of it are the SNP by dividing the UK.
"Boris said it was reckless of David Cameron to commit to keeping the Barnett formula. The only thing reckless would be scrapping it."
He added: "By suggesting he would scrap Barnett, Boris is handing a gift to the SNP. This is yet another reason that Jeremy is the prime minister that Nicola Sturgeon doesn't want.
"Boris should U-turn immediately and follow Jeremy in pledging to keep the Barnett formula. That is what's best for Scotland and the Union."
SNP MSP Tom Arthur suggested that scrapping the formula would "slaughter" public services in Scotland.
Arthur said: "It is outrageous that the Tories are now plotting to use Brexit as an opportunity to railroad systematic cuts to Scotland's budget - offering a grim insight into what Scotland can expect from the next Tory prime minister.
"The Tories have longed for the opportunity to hammer Scotland's budget for years - but the people of Scotland won't stand by while Westminster politicians plot to cut money from our vital public services to fund their disastrous no-deal Brexit.
"Yet again the mask has slipped and fatally undermined the Tories' attempts to portray themselves as working in Scotland's best interests."
Arthur continued: "Boris Johnson's latest scheme to appoint the next Tory leader as Minister of the Union is simply laughable - voters will see this meaningless gimmick for what it is.
"With the hard right-wing of the Tory party threatening to axe the Barnett formula and slaughter Scotland's public services it's time to take our future into our own hands.
"More and more voters are ready to choose a different path to secure a brighter vision for a better Scotland."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel