BREXIT Party MEP Ann Widdecombe has been criticised after comparing Brexit to slaves rising up "against their owners" in a fiery address to the European Parliament.
The former Conservative minister was making her maiden address to the parliament in Strasbourg in the wake of elections which saw a series of top EU jobs allocated behind closed doors, saying the process is "just one of many reasons" why she hopes the UK leaves by the Halloween deadline.
Following negotiations by political leaders, little-known Italian socialist David Sassoli was chosen as president of the new parliament, while German defence minister Ursula von der Leyen was nominated to lead the EU Commission.
Standing alongside Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage, Ms Widdecombe said: "If I needed any convincing at all that the best thing for Britain was to leave here as soon as possible, it was the way that those elections were conducted yesterday.
"Because if that is this place's idea of democracy then that is a serious betrayal of every country that is represented here."
She continued: "There is a pattern that is present throughout history of oppressed people turning against their oppressors: Slaves against their owners. The peasantry against the feudal barons.
She then specifically called out the parliament's Brexit co-ordinator, Guy Verhofstadt, when she referenced "colonies" rising "against their empires".
"And that is why Britain is leaving, and it doesn't matter which language you use: we are going, and we are glad to be going," she continued.
Widdecombe closed the speech with: "Nous allons, wir gehen, we're off."
After the speech, Labour MP David Lammy tweeted: "Anne Widdecombe just compared Britain leaving the EU to "slaves" rising up "against their owners".
"It is impossible to explain how offensive and ahistorical it is for you to equate my ancestors tearing off their chains with your small-minded nationalist project. Shame on you."
Anne Widdecombe just compared Britain leaving the EU to "slaves" rising up "against their owners".
— David Lammy (@DavidLammy) July 4, 2019
It is impossible to explain how offensive and ahistorical it is for you to equate my ancestors tearing off their chains with your small-minded nationalist project. Shame on you. https://t.co/wZVCziXWVM
Fellow Labour MP Dr Rosena Allin-Khan tweeted: "It is disgusting that Ann Widdecombe would reference slavery and colonisation to describe our relationship with the EU. Her and Farage are bankrolled by elites - she's part of the establishment which has created such a divide in this country."
It is disgusting that Ann Widdecombe would reference slavery and colonisation to describe our relationship with the EU. Her and Farage are bankrolled by elites - she's part of the establishment which has created such a divide in this country. https://t.co/UoncdzeDXA
— Dr Rosena Allin-Khan (@DrRosena) July 4, 2019
And Verhofstadt responded: "Nigel Farage facing some stiff competition as chief clown of the Brexit Party in the @Europarl_EN. By the way, when Widdecombe talks about "colonies liberating themselves from their empires", is she really referring to the American Revolution of 1776?"
Nigel Farage facing some stiff competition as chief clown of the Brexit Party in the @Europarl_EN. By the way, when Widdecombe talks about “colonies liberating themselves from their empires”, is she really referring to the American Revolution of 1776? https://t.co/KNtQ7GjaY3
— Guy Verhofstadt (@guyverhofstadt) July 4, 2019
Widdecombe's statement comes two days after her party's MEPs turned their backs on the EU's anthem, Ode to Joy, on the opening day of the legislature.
READ MORE: WATCH : Brexit Party MEPs turn their backs on anthem in EU Parliament
Tuesday marked the opening of the new five-year session of the parliament, though it remains in doubt how long the UK will remain involved.
UK MEPs may sit in the parliament until the country formally leaves the EU.
A deadline of October 31 has currently been set for the UK to leave, though this could be extended if a deal is not found by then.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel