EXPERT evidence was ignored by the UK Home Office as it relied upon “dodgy evidence” and took “unnecessarily hostile action” action against international students accused of cheating in an English language test.
A report today from the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on TOEIC (Test of English for International Communication) claims that key parts of the department’s response have been covered up. It concludes that evidence used by the Home Office to revoke the visas of tens of thousands of international students was “confused, misleading, incomplete and unsafe”.
READ MORE: Home Office tells Arran businesswoman Lizanne Zietsman to leave UK
More than 58,000 students sat the test in the UK between 2011, when US-registered Educational Testing Service (ETS) was first licensed by the Home Office, and 2014.
ETS used voice recognition software and two human “checkers” to analyse the test recordings before concluding that 97% of those who sat the test had “definitely” or “probably” cheated, while just 3% of the results were said to be “valid”.
SNP MP Martyn Day, vice-chair of the APPG, told The National: “The whole situation is a damning example of Theresa May’s hostile environment. Many of these students have gone home and we are having to deal with legacy issues as others who remained in the UK, unable to work or study, their lives in limbo.”
READ MORE: Sex trafficking victims being 'failed by Home Office', report finds
APPG chair, Stephen Timms, said: “One thing that struck me throughout our hearings was that evidence from ETS ... quite simply could not be relied upon. The inquiry concluded that the evidence used against the students was confused, misleading, incomplete and unsafe.”
The APPG said further detentions or forced removals of students accused of cheating should be halted, and those accused of cheating by ETS and who lost their visas should be allowed to sit a new, secure English language test.
Nazek Ramadan, director of Migrant Voice, added: “This report reveals shocking new evidence that the Home Office ignored expert advice, relied on dodgy evidence and took action against students they claimed were treated fairly – and that the department continues to cover up the full extent of those blunders.
READ MORE: Home Office ignores 'human error' FOI 10-day review deadline
“The result was that tens of thousands of people have spent five years living a nightmare. One student told the APPG that the allegation was like a cancer that had infected his whole family.”
The Home Office remained defiant last night. A spokesperson said: “The report does not reflect the findings of the courts, who have consistently found that the evidence of fraud was enough for us to take action.”
They said the National Audit Office was clear on the organised nature of the abuse - demonstrated by the fact that 25 people had been convicted.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel