BORIS Johnson has been warned by one of the architects of the Good Friday Agreement that it is “not bright” to force a rigid deadline on Brexit negotiations.
Bertie Ahern, former premier of the Republic of Ireland, also said the Prime Minister’s aim to secure a new deal with the European Union (EU) is barely achievable by the October 31 deadline.
Johnson has made a “do or die” commitment to achieve Brexit by that date, even if it means leaving the EU without a deal.
Ahern, who served as Taoiseach from 1997 to 2008, urged against seeking simplistic solutions to the complex problem of the Irish backstop to prevent a hard border on the island.
“I think we should all avoid trying to come up with simplistic solutions that this can all be done just by waving a hand or the stroke of a pen,” he said.
“It is complex, it is difficult, it is new, and I think forcing a deadline into that is not bright, and I put it no stronger than that.”
The man who brokered the heralded peace deal with Tony Blair discussed the challenge Johnson will face in getting a deal by the deadline.
“I just don’t see how such a tight timescale – (it’s) nothing to do with the determination, or skill, or ability, or anything – just to agree a whole new agreement, it’s just very hard to see how that can be done by Halloween,” he said.
Ahern said Theresa May’s thrice-failed Withdrawal Agreement clearly states that an alternative solution in the transition period would halt the necessity for the backstop.
He recommended Johnson studies the deal now having “been busy in his campaign”.
“But when he gets time to readit and see there’s an enormous amount of language written about having an international arbitrator that will decide whether this can continue indefinitely,” he said.
Johnson has called for the “abolition” of the backstop and for the renegotiation of a new deal.
Brussels has poured cold water on a fresh agreement, with European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker telling him the existing Withdrawal Agreement was “the best and only” deal possible.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here