EARLIER in the month, I visited Cardiff for the first time and found a city rooted in its cultural identity and signs of the want for something different. Scattered throughout the city were YesCymru – the Welsh campaign for independence – stickers, posters and graffiti, finding a place on lampposts, street signs and in windows.
With similar branding to Yes Scotland, Cardiff looked not unlike many places across Scotland back in 2014 and what remains visible of the campaign today.
Another movement, Extinction Rebellion (XR) – an environmental group – which has seen people take to the streets in London, Leeds, Bristol, Edinburgh and Glasgow as they demand urgent action to tackle the climate crisis, was also making its cause known on the streets of Cardiff.
Since late 2018, Extinction Rebellion has promoted mass nonviolent civil disobedience and rebellion in full public view. XR believes this will cause economic disruption – shaking the current political system – and civil disruption, to raise awareness of “the truth”.
This particular kind of activism is rooted in grassroots movements spanning from across the decades: workers’ rights movements, the fight for civil rights and the AIDS crisis, which led to AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power (ACT UP) mounting a long series of spectacularly headline-grabbing actions of civil disobedience.
These actions by ACT UP included shutting down the New York Stock Exchange, resulting in 73 arrests, disrupting taxpayers filing last-minute tax returns at NYC’s General Post Office and shutting down the Golden Gate Bridge during rush-hour which disrupted residents’ daily commute.
The idea behind these actions was to make it no longer convenient for America to continue to ignore the AIDS crisis.
Like XR, the Scottish independence movement has deployed similar tactics and both movements could and should be able to bring everyone from every background together, transcending age, class, race, disability, gender and sexual identities and immigration status to make a stance against neo-liberalism.
However, the demands for change seldom have radical change at their core and the rhetoric remains firmly embedded in a capitalist system.
The Politics Of Disappearance
THE current climate crisis discourse places emphasis on how little time we have remaining. However, we must remember that for the many communities who had their ways of living and knowledge erased, time for adaptation wasn’t an option.
Today, patterns of environmental discrimination continue to be sustained by capitalistic extortion. Those who have little to no political clout are often then driven into the worst jobs in agribusiness, heavy industry and often live in areas of heavy pollution.
In her book Reversed Realities: Gender Hierarchies In Development Thought (1994), Naila Kabeer writes: “Given that a disproportionate amount of the world’s resources are consumed by a small minority located mainly in the North, the greed of a wealthy minority, rather than the need of the world’s poor, deserves a disproportionate share of the blame.”
This can provide some context as to why climate crisis activism is being led by those in the Global North: either a sense of guilt, or a need to ensure the crisis affects those with the most the very least.
A myth exists that some communities don’t care about the environment because they are too concerned with mere survival. However, if anything, their survival is an environmental issue.
A Single Thread Does Not Make A Weave
UNDENIABLY and with credit, Extinction Rebellion has been responsible for mobilising thousands of people and shifting the narrative on climate change in unprecedented ways.
It has – intentionally or not – become one of the leading voices of the environmental movement and will shape the ideology which comes from its successes and failures.
The climate crisis emergency should be an opportunity to learn from the past and centre the voices which have experienced generations of erasure at the cost of progressing capitalism.
The movement – and all others fighting for change – must recognise that climate change is inherently political, with different impacts for different communities. It must recognise that capitalism, colonialism and the climate crisis are also inherently linked.
Those of us engaged or beginning to engage with the climate emergency need to acknowledge the position of privilege which is afforded to us.
This position enables us to speak of the sense of grief being experienced and dedicate time to the psychological and emotional (pre-)trauma which accompanies our knowledge of the ecological crisis. Our privilege affords us choices, be that becoming BirthStrikers or choosing what kind of diet to adopt. Relinquishment is also choice, and our resilience isn’t one which has been borne out of violence or resistance.
It is not about a (re)turning back, a resurrection of a past which we have been taught to acknowledge as truth and respect. It is about grasping our past, present and future with a critical yet authentic stance against the actors who perpetuate and reinforce capitalism. If we don’t, we are at risk of a capitalism which is more green but still as deadly.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel