LORD Ashcroft’s poll is a landmark moment for the Yes movement, showing as it does a clear majority in favour of independence for the first time in any poll since 2017.
However, it shouldn’t be any great surprise that we’ve reached this point. All of the four previous polls this year asking the standard independence question have shown Yes in the high 40s, despite being conducted by polling firms (YouGov and Panelbase) that in recent years have tended to report more favourable figures for No.
It always seemed entirely possible that other firms would have been showing Yes ahead over the last few months, if they had actually been conducting polls.
Because Lord Ashcroft hasn’t polled on independence for a very long time, it’s unclear whether his methodology slots in more at the Yes-friendly or No-friendly end of the spectrum. That’s a crucial point of uncertainty, because it means we don’t know whether this Yes lead is a recent breakthrough caused by Boris Johnson’s arrival in Downing Street, or whether Ashcroft would have found much the same thing if he had polled earlier in the year.
READ MORE: Scottish independence soars ahead as Ashcroft poll predicts Yes win
We’ll only know for sure that we’re witnessing a “reverse Boris bounce” if the next YouGov or Panelbase poll shows Yes in the 50s.
Ashcroft’s finding that a slim majority of the public (excluding don’t knows) want an independence referendum within the next two years is bang in line with the last Panelbase poll.
However, it’s likely to have a greater psychological impact than the Panelbase figures, because a binary question was used, making it much more difficult for Conservative politicians to misrepresent the result. Many of the claims since 2014 that “Scots don’t want another referendum” have been distortions made possible by polls that asked much more complicated multi-option questions about the preferred timing of a future referendum.
Perhaps the most striking finding of the poll is that, by an overwhelming margin of 52% to 30%, the electorate thinks a new referendum would result in a win for Yes.
READ MORE: First Minister: Indyref2 will be sooner rather than later
There’s a theory in some circles that the “wisdom of crowds” means that if you ask a polling sample to predict the outcome of an election or referendum, you’ll get a more accurate result than if you ask for voting intentions in the standard way.
Of course, prediction polling might be skewed if respondents have been exposed to misinformation in the media about the state of public opinion, but if anything the Scottish media has tended to be unrealistically pessimistic about the prospects for a Yes victory. So Ashcroft’s finding may be an indication that people can sense the tide turning in conversations with family, friends and wider acquaintances.
Drilling deeper within the poll, there are a couple of details that offer clues about how the next General Election might play out, depending on choices made by political leaders.
READ MORE: BBC Scotland under fire over failure to report Ashcroft indy poll
A remarkable 40% of people who voted Labour in 2017 would vote Yes in a new indyref, which suggests that a full-blooded pro-independence campaign could help the SNP win the seats currently held by Labour (with the obvious exception of Unionist-dominated Edinburgh South). And in complete contrast to the rest of the population, 53% of people who voted Tory two years ago want the UK to leave the EU in October, even if that means a No-Deal outcome.
That suggests, ironically, that the SNP may have a better chance in Tory-held seats in the north-east and the Borders if Boris Johnson ends up softening his position on Brexit or backtracking completely – because that could result in hardline anti-EU voters deserting the Tories for the Brexit Party, thus allowing the SNP to come out on top in a number of seats by default.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel