LAST week Boris’s Brexit Batman, Gove, announced £500 million had been set aside to buy slaughtered lambs as part of the No Deal “planning”. Although we have predicted this for over 3 years, it appears that the UK Government have just worked out that No Deal means no market for UK lamb.
The National Farmers’ Union (NFU) now know that it would take a minimum of 6 months for the UK to be certified as an export partner by the EU.
Even if this is approved, tariffs on lamb and beef are likely to be around 40% and 80% respectively, making it too expensive for any market.
No Tariff Rate Quota (TRQ) has been negotiated or secured, although it’s difficult to work out why the EU wouldn’t just allocate all the TRQ to New Zealand and Australia.
Appallingly, it seems we have added stockpiling dead lambs to the required stockpiles of vital medicines, processed food and manufacturing parts.
READ MORE Successful trafficking crackdown shows the importance of European co-operation on policing
Stockpiles of beef cattle are presumably also being presented as a rational solution to an insane proposition.
It’s simply sickening.
And at present there is no articulated plan about how to deal with the meat.
It can’t be butchered and frozen because frozen storage is almost at capacity. It probably can’t be sold into the halal market. The brave new markets the Brexiteers boast about aren’t quite ready. For example, we can look at Japan.
Japan annually imports 24,000 tonnes of lamb, mainly from Australia and New Zealand. We produce 100,000 tonnes of lamb for export every year. Go figure.
It is now time for us to stop this insanity.
We have frictionless free trade with the EU now. Frictionless free trade is exactly what is being ripped out of Scotland’s hands with No Deal or May’s Deal. Or even worse, the really, really bad deal we have to negotiate the day after No Deal.
READ MORE: Worst economic performance in seven years Brexit recession fears
The EU market is 8 times larger than the UK market for Scottish farmers and producers.
Now is the time to paint a compelling picture of future farming in an independent Scotland.
Imagine:
- As an independent member of the EU, our exports will increase.
- Our domestic market will continue to benefit from the protections of the Common Agricultural Policy.
- We will be protecting family farms, strengthening our local food supply chains and getting more local food into our schools, hospitals and care homes.
- We will be diversifying our production, growing more horticultural crops and increasing our food security.
- We will have introduced the right to food and our social security system will be ensuring that children and families in Scotland are no longer food insecure.
- EU nationals will still be working on our farms, in our abattoirs and in our hospitality businesses
- We won’t just be exporting commodity products, we will be adding value here.
And last, but not least, no one knows better than farmers about the climate emergency. Farmers work in the weather every day, they know there’s a problem. So, we wi work with farmers to contain emissions below 1.5 degrees through agroecological approaches.
All of this is worth fighting for and our food producers need us to fight for it. Paying our farmers to stop farming isn’t a tolerable future. The imminent General Election gives us a chance to choose a better future for food and farming in Scotland. Let’s make sure every farmer sees a better future in an independent Scotland.
Heather Anderson is a food campaigner and farmer
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel