THE Greens have fired back at claims they have contributed “nothing of note” to Holyrood.
In his National column, Kevin McKenna criticised the party over their opposition to plans from Wings Over Scotland author Stuart Campbell to stand pro-independence MSPs in the list vote in the next Holyrood election.
READ MORE: Kevin McKenna: Here's why Wings Over Scotland party has my vote
McKenna wrote: “The Greens exist solely as a means of making it look like Holyrood is all diverse and fresh. They have contributed precisely nothing of any note in the 20 years of Holyrood’s existence and have never won a constituency election. They are a boutique party serving as a vehicle for the prejudices of Patrick Harvie.”
Responding, a Scottish Greens spokesperson said: “Just at the moment we are finally making a breakthrough, with support for independence growing in the polls, along comes a proposal which endangers that progress.
“Its sole purpose seems to be to attempt to take votes away from the two pro-independence parties who currently sit in Holyrood, ultimately dividing the Yes movement and allowing the Unionist parties in through the back door.
“It will be a positive and inclusive vision for independence that will win over voters, not a narrow vision based on internet trolling.
READ MORE: Lesley Riddoch: Wings Party could be kick that SNP and Greens need
“Kevin McKenna’s personal attack on the Greens only revealed his lack of awareness of Scottish politics. After all, the majority of Scots pay less tax now because of the Scottish Greens, councils are empowered, disabled people are less likely to face humiliating assessments to get benefits and children are on the verge of getting equal protection from assault.
“Voters are more likely to recognise those achievements than be impressed by how many people an online blogger has upset. If McKenna likes people who get a reaction, he should look at what the Tories have called us.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel