A SECOND Scottish independence referendum would not take place in the "formative years" of a Labour government, Jeremy Corbyn has said.
But he confirmed that his party would not block such a vote.
The Labour leader said if he was voted into Downing Street he would be focused on the "central priorities" of dealing with Brexit, ending austerity and acting to tackle the climate emergency.
He stated: "In the formative years of a Labour government we wouldn't agree to another independence referendum because we will be fully focused on these central priorities.
"However, if at some future point there was a legitimate and fresh mandate, we wouldn't block it."
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon: This was the day independence became inevitable
Scottish Labour had been opposed to another ballot on independence being held, after voters backed staying in the UK by 55% to 45% in 2014.
However, UK shadow chancellor John McDonnell recently said the party would not stand in the way of a second referendum.
Richard Leonard, the party's Scottish leader, said he was in agreement with Corbyn on the timing of a possible second ballot.
He confirmed: "Jeremy and I have agreed that, during the formative years of an incoming Labour government, we would not sanction a Section 30 order to allow a further referendum on Scottish independence to take place."
Leonard added: "It would also only be acceptable to a Labour government to allow a second referendum to proceed if it could be demonstrated that there was a fresh mandate for such a vote to be held. This would require a democratic mandate from the people of Scotland, which clearly signals the majority of people are in favour of a new vote.
"I do not believe that the conditions exist for such a move today, nor will they for the foreseeable future."
Details of the agreement between the two leaders on the timing of a possible Scottish referendum emerged ahead of Corbyn making a campaign trip north of the border.
And he argued that, while a no-deal Brexit would be a "disaster" for Scotland and the rest of the UK, ending the union with England would worsen austerity for Scots and "create more instability and chaos".
Corbyn said: "Boris Johnson's pursuit of a no-deal Brexit will be a disaster for the whole country. He is putting at risk Scottish jobs in manufacturing, food processing and service industries. His intention to suspend Parliament shows he is also a threat to our democracy.
"The best way to defeat Johnson is sticking together, electing a Labour Government and allowing it to get on with sorting the Tory Brexit nightmare and introducing policies that will see transformative investment in Scotland's people, communities and public services."
The UK Labour leader continued: "Scottish independence is not the answer to Johnson. Independence will only further prolong and intensify austerity and create more instability and chaos.
"What Scotland needs is a Labour government that prioritises investing in Scotland, focuses on dealing with Brexit, ending austerity and tackling the climate emergency."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel