ON the 22nd of September 2012, with the starting gun fired, I found myself on a platform in Princes Street Gardens making the first political speech of my life. It ended: “People will not be voting Yes in 2014 for any particular party or government. This is a referendum, not a parliamentary election.
“People voting Yes will be quite simply plighting their troth to their country’s future as a state as well as a nation. And I will be one of them.”
There followed many conversations with people – mainly in the cultural rather than the political realm – as to how this dream might most easily be made flesh. And the overwhelming feeling was that a thousand flowers needed to bloom; we all had to plan and execute ideas which might attract and persuade people to the overarching Yes cause.
Enter my partner in crime. Unlike me, Jean Urquhart was, for part of her adult life, an elected politician. The former chatelaine of The Ceilidh Place in Ullapool had been first a councillor then an MSP at Holyrood. A woman of independent mind, she switched from SNP to Independent when her party decided to endorse future Scottish membership of Nato.
We had been friends for many years; indeed, she and my late husband had both been raised in Bathgate and knew each other before Jean and I met. We shared broadly similar convictions and values. And a suitable sense of the ridiculous.
We hatched a plot. Supposing she and I were to undertake a road trip; a trip in the weeks leading up to polling day to various Scottish islands in my modest VW Beetle? Suitably customized for the occasion. We would also have the company of my normal navigator: Ghillie, the Tibetan Terrier. Another woman with attitude.
READ MORE: Alan Bissett: Why Unionists tried to discredit Scotland's artists
(Which led to our first little local difficulty. Ghillie knew her place and that was in the front passenger seat. The glower aimed at Jean from the back seat would have felled a more wimpy soul than Mistress Urquhart at 50 paces.)
I visited the Yes campaign offices and relieved them of a bagload of goodies with which to charm the hopefully friendly natives en route. We planned an island hop which would take in Arran, Mull, Islay and, a little later, Shetland, which was ultimately to become Jean’s new home.
We planned accommodation around the car ferry dates; a wonderful wee turf-roofed cottage on Arran; a farmhouse B&B on Islay; a friend’s house on Iona and another in Lerwick. Sorted. Sort of.
And we planned some formal meetings alongside our determination to leave no passer-by/tourist/local dweller unturned in our mission to maximise the Yes vote.
But the meetings would be geared to people and places with no formal political connections or known leanings one way or t’other. We may have lacked experience as itinerant evangelists for Yes, but what we lacked in know-how, we hoped to compensate for in enthusiasm and raw passion for the cause.
The Arran sojourn almost turned two time-served agnostics into true believers. The sun split the heavens, and one evening, as we ate shoreside in Lamlash, we watched children laughing and playing in the sea. In Scotland. In a Scottish summer. The omen felt good.
No names, no pack drill about the meeting room where we met target voters. Suffice to say it had a fairly intimate relationship with the NHS. We had a rough-and-ready pitch for each occasion. A sort of good cop/good cop routine.
And we found folk eager to chat, eager to debate, eager to ask questions. No eggs or rotten tomatoes were harmed in the making of these encounters.
The Islay sojourn was similarly pleasant, though some in the farming community were obviously oblivious to our blandishments. I thought then, and still do now, that an antipathy to the Common Agricultural Policy and its supposed bias to French rural communities might have some merit. But it wouldn’t pay many bills when the subsidies disappeared.
And as we drove around the winding and single-track island roads, at once enchanting and frustrating, we saw a great deal of signage suggesting that the EU had underwritten a wheen of infrastructure projects.
Our landlady on Iona, base camp for Mull, provided one of our more unexpected hustings. She invited a load of people round her dinner table and set us loose on them – many sceptical, but many persuadable. We gave it our best shot ...
This is an excerpt from Summer Of '14, our upcoming glossy indyref magazine. For the full (much longer) piece, pre-order your copy today!
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here