JACOB Rees-Mogg was described as the “physical embodiment of arrogance” and “entitlement” after he sprawled out across the front bench of the Commons last night during an emergency debate brought as part of measures to stop a No-Deal Brexit.
A photograph of the hardliner spread out over three seats was posted to Twitter by Labour MP Anna Turley, who said it was: “The physical embodiment of arrogance, entitlement, disrespect and contempt for our parliament.”
Her criticisms were echoed in the chamber by Green MP Caroline Lucas, who addressed Rees-Mogg in her speech.
She said: “There has been a lot of talk about democracy tonight, and the leader of the House, who I have to say with his body language this evening has been so contemptuous and of the people. And for the benefit of Hansard, the leader of the House has been spread out across three seats, lying out as if it was something boring to listen to tonight.
“Well can I just say to him when he’s been lecturing us on democracy, we will have none of it.”
MPs heckled Rees-Mogg by telling him to “sit up!” as the perplexed Tory government minister looked on with bafflement.
Earlier in the evening, the leader of the Commons had accused Oliver Letwin, who tabled the emergency debate motion, of “stunning arrogance” and likened those wanting to take control of the order paper to the “illuminati who are taking the powers to themselves”.
He added: “It is not, however, for Parliament to undertake the role and functions of the executive.
“Constitutional convention is that executive power is exercised by Her Majesty’s Government which has the democratic mandate to govern.
“That mandate is derived from the British people and represented through this House.
“When we look at this constitution we are protected by our rules and our orders and by our conventions.”
The Commons leader added: “It is those rules, those laws, those conventions that protect us from the winds of tyranny.”
SNP MP David Linden asked whether or not the Government would not stop an anti-No Deal law getting Royal Assent. Rees-Mogg replied: “The law will be followed.
“This country is a country that follows the rule of law and its government assiduously follows constitutional conventions, unlike some other members of this House.”
During the exchanges, Rees-Mogg said the approach taken by MPs was “the most unconstitutional use of this House since the days of Charles Stewart Parnell when he tried to bung up Parliament.”
Later, the SNP MP Tommy Sheppard warned the Government that Scottish independence “was coming down the track”.
He said that ahead of a General Election the SNP would be “explaining to the people of Scotland that this is their chance to consider having a different course of action than the one they are being lead down by the Prime Minister”.
He added: “I am confident that when we go to the people of Scotland so many more than every before will understand the attractiveness of having political independence over their own affairs and be able to control in Britain, the Europe and the world and I warn the Government to be aware of it.”
During a heated debate, independent MP Nick Boles called for Tory MPs to cross the floor and join him on the opposition benches. He said: “To those brave souls on the Conservative benches who face expulsion from the party for voting for the motion today, I say this: your country needs you. Do what you know to be right.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel