SNP MP Pete Wishart has announced he will not seek to stand for the position of Speaker of the House of Commons, saying he intends to continue working “flat out” for independence and devote his time to working towards the next referendum, one he says he is “certain will be won”.
The role of speaker is being vacated by John Bercow, who is standing down.
Wishart, writing in his blog on Wednesday, also hit out at “absurd assertions” from detractors who claimed his interest in standing for the post showed a “lack of commitment” on securing independence or a “desire” to stay at Westminster. He said that standing in a contest in which he knew he had no chance of winning was instead a means to promote the cause of independence.
He writes: “My bid for the speakership was done with the full understanding that it would be highly unlikely to be successful as a representative of the third party with only 35 MPs. Part of my motivation for standing was to highlight the absurdity of some of the mechanics and procedures of the House of Commons, to contrast it with what is happening in Scotland, and use it to detail why Scotland should play no further part in Westminster’s proceedings.
READ MORE: Pete Wishart's blog article in full
“A competition around the speakership would provide an excellent opportunity to promote the case for Scotland’s independence by proposing how we could do things differently in an independent Scotland.
“It would also have been an opportunity to poke a gentle stick at the whole Westminster political establishment. That opportunity will now be lost in a competition that will be exclusively contested by Unionist MPs.”
He also thanked those colleagues, from all parties, who had offered their support, as well as his constituents in Perth and North Perthshire.
He added: “I now look forward to defending my parliamentary seat in the forthcoming General Election and, as I have for the past 18 years as a parliamentarian, working flat out to secure my nation’s independence and sovereignty.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel