THE former president of the European Council has said an application for an independent Scotland to join the EU would be “very seriously” considered.
In an interview with the BBC, Herman Van Rompuy said Brexit had altered European attitudes to Scottish independence.
He said: “I think there is a change, yes, because for a lot of people they are looking at what Scottish people are in favour of.
“They want to stay in the European Union and at the same time they are prevented to stay in the European Union.”
Scottish Brexit Minister Michael Russell said the remarks were “welcome”.
But the UK Government’s Scottish Secretary, Alister Jack, claimed there were still questions over whether or not an independent Scotland would be able to join Europe.
Van Rompuy, who served between 2009 and 2014, said there was “much more sympathy for regions – parts of a country – that want to join the European Union” among European leaders than before.
He warned that any vote for independence must be legally watertight.
If there was a Yes vote in a referendum that was “constitutional” he said Scotland would have a “legal case”.
READ MORE: Ian Blackford hails ‘significant’ new support for indyref2 poll
READ MORE: Willie Rennie ‘beyond hypocritical’ on indyref2
“Then, of course, the outcome has to be considered by the European Union very seriously,” he added.
Accession would not be automatic, he added, “there are rules to be respected and we have all to agree on a new candidate”.
Van Rompuy said there were still “hesitations” about Scottish independence in Spain, which is concerned about Catalonia breaking away.
Though he added that the situation was very different.
The politician, who was previously prime minister of Belgium, and is an opponent of the Flemish nationalist movement, said he was not enthusiastic about the UK breaking up.
“I fought all my life against separatism in my own country, so don’t ask me to applaud when this would happen,” he said.
Russell said the comments show “that there is clearly real sympathy and understanding for Scotland’s position in Europe, particularly given the hard-line anti-EU position of the UK Government”.
He added: “People in Scotland voted overwhelmingly to remain in the EU and there is no doubt an independent Scotland will make a strong contribution to both the EUs core values and shared goals such as tackling climate change.
“Scotland of course has been inside the EU and observing the acquis for over 45 years and Lord Kerr, the author of Article 50 and the UK’s former permanent representative to the EU, has said an independent Scotland’s accession negotiation would be, ‘very swift’.”
Jack disagreed: “There are very real questions about whether an independent Scotland would be able to re-join the EU, not least because Scotland’s notional deficit is more than double that allowed under EU rules.
“I am very clear that Scotland’s future is better served by staying in the United Kingdom, keeping the pound, retaining control over of our democratic rights, and having control over our own fishing waters.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel