JO Swinson was forced to deny “fundamental hypocrisy” over her opposition to indyref2 as she struggled through a radio interview.
The LibDem leader faced severe criticism after members of her party voted overwhelmingly at their conference to cancel Brexit if they win power at Westminster.
In an interview with BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Swinson was asked why it was ok for her MPs to cancel Brexit without a second referendum on the issue, but not ok for the SNP to go into a Scottish election promising indyref2.
Programme host Justin Webb said: “When the SNP say that in Scotland, as they do repeatedly at elections, ‘we’ll get another referendum if people vote for us,’ you say to them no, you can’t, you shouldn’t.
“If they go into an election in Scotland – it seems like such a fundamental hypocrisy on your behalf – and say to the Scottish people, ‘we want to have a second referendum campaign and there’s no need for anything except your endorsement at that election,’ it’s the same as you going into an election saying what you’re saying to everyone else.”
READ MORE: LibDem Willie Rennie ‘beyond hypocritical’ on indyref2
The BBC presenter continued: “It’s a principle. It’s not about what the result might be, it’s a point of principle. Either you can overturn a referendum by putting something in your manifesto and getting elected or you can’t.”
He added: “You say in Great Britain you can, but in Scotland, you can’t. It’s simply a different principle for Scotland as it is for the UK.”
Jo Swinson claims the SNP don’t mention independence during elections. No, really 👇 pic.twitter.com/awNzSPPxRC
— Boab Thomas (@MeanwhileScotia) September 16, 2019
Swinson denied this was true, adding the bizarre assertion that the SNP do not promote independence ahead of elections.
She said: “The SNP’s typical playbook is going into elections not mentioning independence, saying to people all sorts of other things they’re voting for. They say it’s not about independence then, after the vote, they claim it as a mandate.”
The LibDem leader was once again challenged by the host, who remarked on the SNP’s support for independence: “The clue is in the name of the party.”
READ MORE: SNP depute leader Keith Brown slams LibDems for new Brexit policy
Swinson continued: “I want our country to thrive, Scotland in the UK and the UK in the EU. The problem right now, which whether it’s a People’s Vote or whether a General Election can resolve, is how to get out of that chaos. What we’re talking about in terms of Scotland is the idea of an independence referendum adding more chaos into an already difficult situation.”
“I’m saying the last thing Scotland needs right now is indyref 2. We’re better off staying together. The United Kingdom is stronger as four nations working together and I think the European Union is stronger as 28 countries working together.
“My general principle of being open and internationalist is about working together with other countries to face common challenged. It’s much more inconsistent for the SNP to want to stay in the EU but out of the UK.”
Kirsty Blackman, the SNP’s deputy leader at Westminster said Swinson was guilty of “utterly grotesque” hypocrisy. The Libdems were, she added, neither liberal nor democratic.
“Her arrogance in thinking she can stand in the way of the electoral verdict of the people of Scotland is appalling – she and Willie Rennie are every bit as anti-democratic as Boris Johnson,” Blackman said.
“It seems she only believes in democracy when it suits her and is happy to ignore the fact that Liberal Democrat supporters across the UK now back a referendum on Scottish independence.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel