THE Royal Bank of Scotland has appointed Alison Rose as its new chief executive officer.
Rose was the heavy favourite to succeed Ross McEwan as boss of the publicly owned bank when he departs from the company on October 31.
She is currently the bank’s chief executive of its commercial and private banking arm, as well as deputy CEO of Natwest Holdings. Her work for RBS has spanned 27 years and she also runs RBS’s commercial and private banking businesses, including Coutts.
The appointment will make RBS the only company in the FTSE 100 index with women in its top two executive positions, joining chief financial officer Katie Murray.
Rose told investors it is an “exciting new chapter” for the bank as it faces “economic and political uncertainty” as well as changing consumer behaviour.
Her appointment comes after McEwan led a lengthy turnaround of the business in his five-and-a-half-year tenure as chief.
McEwan announced his departure plans in April and is set to take over as chief executive of National Australia Bank.
Rose said: “It is a huge honour to have been appointed as the new CEO of RBS and I am looking forward to getting started.
“As one of the oldest and most important financial institutions in the UK, we have a key role to play in supporting the economy and championing the potential that exists across the country.”
Howard Davies, chairman of RBS, said: “I am delighted that we have appointed Alison as our new CEO. She brings extensive experience and a track record of success from her previous roles at the bank.
“Following a rigorous internal and external process, I am confident that we have appointed the best person for the job.
“I’d like to take this opportunity to thank Ross, on behalf of the board, for his leadership and commitment during his time as CEO and wish him the very best for the future.
“Ross leaves a strong platform for his successor – a bank that has refocused on its core markets in the UK and Ireland and resolved all its major legacy issues, while returning to profitability and paying dividends.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here