THE gap between rich and poor began 7000 years ago when land became more valuable than people, suggests new research.
Farmers began using ox-drawn ploughs to harvest crops instead of their hands and the class system was born, according to the study. Researchers say that it enabled them to grow 10 times more cereals and vegetables without needing extra workers.
Those who owned land and ox teams also began to opt for more stress-tolerant crops, like barley or certain kinds of wheat, that didn’t require much labour. By the second millennium BC, in many farming landscapes, fields stretched to the horizon.
Societies were deeply divided between wealthy landowners, who passed their holdings to their children and land-poor or landless families.
Study co-author Professor Samuel Bowles, an economist at the Santa Fe Institute, New Mexico, explained: “Ox drawn ploughs were the robots of the late Neolithic.”
The oxen were a form of technology that separated wealth from labour – a fundamental development in the inequality we see today.
SEE ALSO: The mystery around a Scottish captain who fell into the record books
Bowles said: “The effect was the same as today – growing economic disparities between those who owned the robots and those whose work the robots displaced.”
The findings, published in the journal Antiquity, add to growing evidence that lasting divisions between the haves and have-nots can be traced back to the Neolithic or late Stone Age. But it was kick-started by the first farming “machinery” rather than the change from a hunter-gatherer to an agricultural lifestyle, in itself.
The international team’s analysis of data from 150 archaeological sites across Eurasia revealed a steep increase in inequality from around 4000 BC.
This was about 8000 years after the advent of farming. They used statistical methods to compare different kinds of wealth, societies, regions and times.
Lead author Professor Amy Bogaard, an archaeologist at the University of Oxford, said: “The surprise here isn’t so much inequality takes off later on, it is that it stayed low for such a long time.”
The finding backs a previous analysis of 300 human skeletons by British scientists that suggested the concept of inherited wealth started with Neolithic man 7000 years ago.
Co-author Professor Mattia Fochesato, an economist at Bocconi University, Milan, said: “The usual story – that the societies that adopted agriculture became more unequal – is no longer valid because we observed some societies who adopted agriculture were remarkably egalitarian for thousands of years.”
READ MORE: New research proves crater impact killed dinosaurs
Before around 4000 BC, people across the Middle East and Europe cultivated a patchwork of small garden plots. They were like present day allotments in the UK, said Bogaard.
Families would have grown a variety cereal grains as well as lentils, peas, and other pulse crops that needed to be harvested by hand.
Notably, they would have tilled the soil by hand using hoes, in some cases also with the help of unspecialised cattle such as ageing milk cows to pull ploughs.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel