CABINET Office minister Michael Gove has accused the SNP of putting "sectarian" arguments ahead of a Brexit deal.
Gove's remarks came in the House of Commons, as the Tory MP faced questions on the UK Government's preparations for a No-Deal Brexit.
SNP MP Tommy Sheppard had pressed him on the Prime Minister's timeline of an EU exit on October 31.
Sheppard said: "Surely the time has come now to assess: is it realistically possible to get a deal to leave the European Union on October 31?
READ MORE: Joanna Cherry: Attorney General is now fall guy for prorogue plan
"The house has considered this question and come to a judgement that it probably would not be possible, and therefore it is necessary for the Government to apply for an extension to the process.
"I want to know from the minister, will he accept that mandate from this Parliament, will he do and act as a member of this government to make sure that it is implemented, or will he continue to flout the will of the House and proceed on preparations which, frankly, are to prepare for a situation that is now unlawful according to the law of the land."
Gove, in his response, accused the SNP of putting "narrow, sectarian, secessionist and separatist arguments" ahead of securing a Brexit deal.
He said: "I do not shirk from the fact that there are serious challenges, we are all aware of those, we would all much prefer to leave with a deal.
"And the Honourable Gentleman asks what preparations are being made in order to secure a deal, I listed some of the advances which are being made in negotiations earlier, but one of the things I would say is that we have had a chance in this House of Commons to vote for deals before, and it was the choice of his party resolutely not to vote for a deal."
Gove paused due to heckling at this point, but after the Speaker's intervention resumed: "We could have a Withdrawal Agreement if only members of the Scottish National Party were as good as their word and put the interests of Scotland ahead of narrow sectarian, secessionist and separatist arguments."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel