THE introduction of minimum unit pricing for alcohol has had little impact on retailer revenues, new research suggests.
A report on the economic impact of minimum unit pricing (MUP), commissioned by NHS Health Scotland, found that the policy led to a drop in sales of alcoholic drinks in the nine months following its introduction last May.
However, retailers questioned for the study reported that while there has been a “small but significant decrease” in the volume of drinks sold, the overall effects on revenue have been small as increased prices have compensated for the lower volumes of sales.
READ MORE: UK ‘should follow Scotland on drink’
The effect on producer revenues and profitability has been negative but the impact has been “small or negligible” since the minimum 50p per unit price was introduced in May 2018, it found.
No retailers or producers reported closing local units, reducing staff numbers or reducing investment.
Researchers carried out case studies with eight organisations representing different parts of the industry, including a supermarket, convenience and specialist off-trade retailers, an on-trade retailer, spirits producers and two brewers.
READ MORE: Alcohol-related hospital admissions plunge since SNP came to power
Andrew Leicester, manager at Frontier Economics, which carried out the study, said: “The respondents interviewed in this study suggested that demand changed in a number of ways in the first nine months following MUP coming into force, with sales of products that were previously retailing below the minimum unit price decreasing the most.
“Demand for smaller sizes, low-alcohol products or premium products less affected by price increases has seen some producers and retailers adapt their strategy and product offering in response to MUP.”
He added: “The research has so far found no evidence of MUP having a significant impact on the profitability, turnover or employment of Scottish retailers located near the Border.”
Retailers reported that many consumers have switched to smaller pack or bottle sizes as a result of MUP and many have moved over to a variety of substitute alcoholic and low-alcohol drinks.
Sales have decreased the most from products that were previously retailing far below MUP, the study found.
The researchers also interviewed retailers on both sides of the Scotland-England Border about whether they thought MUP had led to an increase in people from Scotland buying alcohol from stores in England.
They found some evidence of this, although retailers noted cross-border purchasing was happening prior to the introduction of MUP, as many consumers who live near the border in Scotland work in Carlisle or Berwick-upon-Tweed, or conduct weekly grocery shopping in these towns.
Public Health Minister Joe FitzPatrick MSP said: “Early sales data are promising – data for 2018 shows a 3% drop in sales of pure alcohol per adult – and I look forward to seeing a reduction in health harms in the future.
“It is also important to look at the impacts of MUP on the alcohol industry in Scotland, as required by the 2012 Act. This initial assessment is simply the first part of the jigsaw.
“The final report of this work is due in 2022, and, very importantly, this will analyse quantitative data thoroughly.”
Neil Craig, head of evaluation at NHS Health Scotland, said: “NHS Health Scotland are leading a robust and comprehensive evaluation of Minimum Unit Pricing, which will provide a full understanding of what difference the legislation is making, and to whom.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel