BORIS Johnson urged Brussels to compromise, claiming his government was putting forward "constructive and reasonable proposals" to resolve the Brexit deadlock.
The Prime Minister insisted the UK was ready to leave without a deal on October 31 if no deal was reached.
In his keynote speech at the Conservative Party conference Johnson insisted his plan to replace the Irish backstop would "in no circumstances" result in checks at or near the border in Northern Ireland.
The Tory leader also slammed idea of holding indyref2, reiterating that 2014 was a "once in a generation" opportunity.
He also accused the SNP of planning to “bungle [Jeremy Corbyn] toward the throne ... so they can get on with their programme of national discord ..."
READ MORE: Here's what Boris Johnson said about Scotland in Tory conference speech
READ MORE: SNP react to Boris Johnson's Tory conference speech
Outlining his Irish border plan, Johnson said it will prioritise:
- No checks "at or near" Irish border
- Respect for Good Friday Agreement
- Consent from executive and assembly for NI Protection of existing regulatory arrangements for farmers
- Control of trade policy
He said: "Today in Brussels we are tabling what I believe are constructive and reasonable proposals which provide a compromise for both sides.
"We will under no circumstances have checks at or near the border in Northern Ireland. We will respect the peace process and the Good Friday agreement "And by a process of renewable democratic consent by the executive and assembly of Northern Ireland we will go further and protect the existing regulatory arrangements for farmers and other businesses on both sides of the border.
"And at the same time we will allow the UK – whole and entire – to withdraw from the EU, with control of our own trade policy from the start. "
Johnson acknowledged the plan represented a "compromise by the UK".
"I hope very much that our friends understand that and compromise in their turn," he told the Manchester conference.
"Because if we fail to get an agreement because of what is essentially a technical discussion of the exact nature of future customs checks, when that technology is improving the whole time, then let us be in no doubt that the alternative is no deal.
"That is not an outcome we want. It is not an outcome we seek at all.
"But ... it is an outcome for which we are ready."
READ MORE: Tory conference: What to expect from Boris Johnson's speech
READ MORE: Alyn Smith: Scottish Tories are the DUP without the songs
British officials have made clear to EU counterparts that the legal texts being presented to the European Union are a final offer and unless Brussels is prepared to engage there will be no more talks until after Brexit.
The plan involves a "two borders for four years" measure that will leave Northern Ireland in a relationship with Europe until 2025, according to The Daily Telegraph.
It accepts the need for both a regulatory border between Britain and Northern Ireland in the Irish Sea for four years and customs checks between the North and the Irish Republic.
Ireland's deputy prime minister, Simon Coveney, speaking late on Tuesday night, said this was "no basis for an agreement" and "concerning to say the least".
Johnson will speak to European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker on Wednesday afternoon to discuss the Prime Minister's Brexit plan.
The commission said it will not "pre-empt any reaction" before having a chance to study the proposals to replace the backstop.
Johnson told the conference "we can, we must and we will" get Brexit done.
Despite the "Surrender Bill" – the legislation passed into law aimed at blocking the Prime Minister from taking the UK out of the EU without a deal unless he has the consent of MPs – Johnson insisted he would meet the October 31 deadline "come what may".
He said that people felt they were being "taken for fools" by Westminster's failure to honour the result of the 2016 referendum and warned of "grave consequences" if Brexit was not delivered.
In a speech clearly aimed at wooing voters ahead of the election he has so far not been blocked by MPs from calling, Johnson: - Claimed the pro-Brexit Tories would "turbocharge the Scottish fishing sector" while the SNP would hand back control to the EU.
- Insisted the Tories were "the party of the NHS" and would also "solve the problem of social care", although he did not set out how - Branded Jeremy Corbyn's Labour a party of "fratricidal, anti-Semitic Marxists"
- Said the LibDems idea of serving the national interest was "to write to Jean-Claude Juncker urging him not to give this country a better deal"
Johnson, who skipped Prime Minister's Questions in the Commons to address the less hostile crowd in Manchester, said Parliament was "on the blink".
If it were a school "Ofsted would be shutting it down" and if it were a reality TV show "the whole lot of us would have been voted out of the jungle".
"The sad truth is that voters have more say over I'm a Celebrity than they do over this House of Commons," he said.
Speaking at PMQs, SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford commented: "Right now the Prime Minister is setting out his Brexit fantasy at the Tory Party conference.
“A deal that he knows is unacceptable and doomed to failure."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel