BBC journalists have been criticised for potentially damaging the police investigation into false allegations of a Westminster VIP paedophile ring.
Home affairs correspondent Tom Symonds showed two photographs of boys who went missing in the 1970s and 1980s to Carl Beech at a meeting in 2014, according to a report.
The family of one, Martin Allen, was later spoken to by police officers, as Scotland Yard investigated whether he was one of three youngsters murdered in allegations invented by the fantasist previously known as "Nick".
READ MORE: VIP paedophile ring probe to be investigated by police watchdog
In his review of the Operation Midland investigation, Henriques said: "The upset caused to that family is one of several distressing aspects of this case."
He said police should have warned BBC journalists of the "potential damage they were causing to the investigation".
Sir Richard added: "The photographic identification by Tom Symonds was fundamentally flawed and would not be admitted in a court.
"'Nick' may be a suggestible victim and may have wanted to identify someone in order to seek closure."
A BBC spokeswoman said: "The photographs of two boys were shown to Beech in order to test the veracity of existing newspaper reports which had contained speculation linking the boys to Beech's allegations and the Metropolitan Police investigation.
"At this point Operation Midland was already under way and Beech had been interviewed at length by the police.
"We are satisfied our reporter's actions did not contravene our editorial guidelines and we note and respect the findings of Sir Richard Henrique's independent review."
The now-defunct Exaro news agency, which ran a string of stories about allegations of sex abuse by people in the public eye, is also criticised in the report.
It said: "There can be no doubt that 'Nick' received information and assistance from Exaro and other journalists that misled Midland officers and contributed to their concluding at an early stage that 'Nick' was credible."
The report said Exaro journalists took "Nick" on a tour of London to identify places where alleged abuse had occurred, while he was also shown photographs and supplied names by investigative reporters.
"This intrusive conduct caused difficulties for the Midland officers which I have not overlooked," Henriques added.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here