NICOLA Sturgeon has had her say on the Lord Provost who was forced to apologise after claiming thousands of pounds worth of clothes, shoes and underwear on expenses.
Responding to Tory Adam Tomkins at First Minister’s Questions, the First Minister said that Eva Bolander had been “excellent” in her role.
Sturgeon added that leadership positions, such as lord provost, should not be only for those “who can afford to equip themselves" for those roles.
The SNP Glasgow Lord Provost yesterday apologised after she claimed £8000 in taxpayer-funded expenses.
READ MORE: Glasgow Lord Provost Eva Bolander apologises over £8000 expenses spend
Over the course of two years, the Swedish-born Bolander claimed expenses for hats, clothing, shoes, haircuts and nail treatments.
The Lord Provost’s claims were all within the rules and she said everything was done “in good faith”.
At this afternoon's FMQs, Tomkins, Conservative MSP for Glasgow, asked: “First Minister, the SNP’s Lord Provost has ripped off the people of Glasgow.
"Isn’t it time she went?”
Sturgeon replied: “Eva Bolander, who I think is an excellent Lord Provost for the city of Glasgow, has, I think, rightly and very frankly, reflected on some of the expense claims she made – all of which, I will say, were within the rules – but nevertheless, reflected on them and decided herself that she should not have made certain claims.
“I think that is the right decision.”
She added: “Beyond that, I think all of us as elected politicians have to be careful and considered about our expense claims.
“But I don’t think any of us want to have a situation where it’s only people who can take those roles, particularly those like lord provosts, that require attendance at a lot of formal functions – that it’s only people who can afford to equip themselves for that who can take on those roles.
“So I think the Lord Provost has herself reflected and I think she was absolutely right to do so.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel