JOHN Swinney has said George Osborne was “wrong” to publish a letter from his top civil servant during the independence referendum campaign which warned about a currency union between the UK and an independent Scotland.
The deputy first minister hit out at the former chancellor over putting the document by Sir Nicholas Macpherson into the public domain.
The coalition government took the unusual step of publishing the official’s two-page argument against a sterling zone in February 2014.
The letter warned he would advise strongly against such an arrangement saying it would be fraught with difficulty. However, it triggered accusations that Macpherson was acting on the instructions of his boss when it was produced alongside the chancellor’s announcement formally ruling out a currency deal.
Attention was drawn to the episode yesterday during a SNP conference fringe meeting on the impartiality of the civil service.
Swinney defended Macpherson for writing the letter but criticised the then chancellor for publishing it, saying it put the civil servant in the public spotlight.
“I think the letter that Sir Nick Macpherson wrote to the chancellor was perfectly appropriate,” he said.
“What I thought what was inappropriate was the publication of that letter by the chancellor.
“Because what that did, and I don’t know this as I have never had a conversation with Sir Nicholas Macpherson about this point, but that put him into the public spotlight as opposed to the chancellor saying: ‘My view is ... ’
“And the chancellor is perfectly entitled to say that but what I didn’t think he was entitled to do is publish a letter which Macpherson had properly made available to the chancellor in his professional judgement.”
Dave Penman, general secretary of the FDA, the trade union for senior and middle ranking civil servants, was also highly critical of Osborne.
“I think George Osborne decided to publish that because he thought he added weight to his argument and I thought that exposed the civil service in a way, given how difficult that situation was in the referendum for civil servants serving two governments with such diametrically opposed policies, I thought was indefensible,” he said.
Pressed that the publication of the letter wasn’t against Macpherson’s will, Swinney said such permission was irrelevant.
Earlier in the discussion Swinney said the SNP could trust the impartiality of civil servants and pointed to the warm welcome a former head of the Scottish Government civil service had given him after the SNP were first elected to government in 2007 and just after he had served the Labour/LibDem coalition in Edinburgh.
Meanwhile Penman told of death threats made against some senior civil servants and the need for them to be given increased security because of public discourse in the current Brexit process.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel