THE Scottish Secretary has been accused of not taking his role "seriously" after making what he called a "flippant remark" about the Welsh Secretary during a key committee meeting.
Alister Jack appeared before the Scottish Affairs Committee for the first time today and was asked about his department's spending on social media by SNP MP Deidre Brock.
The MP for Edinburgh North and Leith asked Jack why the Scotland Office spends a "significant amount" on social media while the Welsh Office spends nothing.
Jack replied: “They’re less ambitious than us for the Union, obviously. We take it very seriously and we want to promote the good work that we do. There’s a lot of things – whether it’s type 31 Frigates in Rosyth, £211m for Scottish farmers, the COP26 coming to Glasgow … we want people to know about the good things that this government is doing for the United Kingdom and for Scotland.”
Brock responded: “You’re seriously saying that the Secretary of State for Wales is less ambitious for his area than you are?”
Here's the Scottish Secretary saying he's more committed to the UK than the Welsh Secretary then saying he shouldn't be taken seriously. This is him answering questions about his work to the Scottish Affairs Committee but he doesn't take it seriously... #MotherOfParliaments pic.twitter.com/WwNPXDKfof
— Deidre Brock MP (@DeidreBrock) October 16, 2019
Contradicting himself, the Scottish Secretary quickly said: “That was a flippant remark, I wouldn’t take it too seriously. As to what he does and how he chooses to do it that’s a matter for him – all I’m saying is we take it very seriously promoting the UK Government in Scotland.”
Brock later took to Twitter to criticise Jack over the encounter.
She posted: "Here's the Scottish Secretary saying he's more committed to the UK than the Welsh Secretary then saying he shouldn't be taken seriously.
READ MORE: Devolution: Scottish Secretary announces reform proposals
"This is him answering questions about his work to the Scottish Affairs Committee but he doesn't take it seriously... #MotherOfParliaments"
During his appearance before the committee, Jack also announced a "package of proposals" for devolution reform would be published before the end of the year.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel