BORIS Johnson has done what he said he would “rather be dead in a ditch” than do: he formally requested a Brexit extension until January 31 2020.
The first of three separate letters dispatched to Brussels asked for an extension of Article 50 talks as required by the so-called Benn Act, but while it was attributed to the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom it was not signed by Johnson.
The second was a photocopy of the five pages of the Benn legislation, which required him to apply for the extension until the end of January 2020 if MPs had not approved his exit deal by October 19.
READ MORE: Blackford: How many other unsigned letters has Johnson sent?
In a third letter to Donald Tusk, president of the European Council – which was signed by Johnson – the Prime Minister said he did not favour an extension as it would “damage the interests of the UK and our EU partners”.
He said he was confident of passing his Brexit deal by October 31, with a meaningful vote on the deal expected today in the House of Commons.
However, the government’s defeat in the Commons on Saturday over an amendment forcing an extension means Johnson must ask Brussels to prolong negotiations beyond October 31 to comply with the law.
READ MORE: PM acting like 'spoilt brat' over Brexit extension letter
The first of the three letters said the UK was requesting an extension to January 31 2020, but should a deal be ratified before this date, the “government proposes that the period should be terminated early”.
In his letter to Tusk, Johnson wrote: “I regret causing my fellow leaders to devote more time and energy to a question I had hoped we had resolved last week.”
The Prime Minister said he would also be ready to come back to Brussels to talk to the 27 EU leaders to “answer properly any question on the position of HM Government and progress in the ratification process”.
Judges will today meet in the Court of Session in Edinburgh to consider whether Johnson has complied with the Benn Act.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel