A citizens' assembly to debate Scotland 's future will cost taxpayers almost £1.4 million, the Scottish Government has revealed.
Constitutional Relations Secretary Mike Russell disclosed the financial cost of holding a citizens' assembly in response to a written question from fellow SNP MSP Angela Constance.
It plans to gather approximately 120 "broadly representative" people from across Scotland to discuss issues such as Brexit and independence.
Russell confirmed the Scottish Government would be giving £1.37 million to fund the six meetings, the first of which will take place in Edinburgh this weekend.
The money, Russell explained, will be spent giving "gifts of thanks to members" and providing expenses to support people attending the discussions.
Participants, selected in a similar manner to jury members, will also receive up to £1,200 to attend six residential weekend assemblies that are due to be held from Saturday until April 2020.
In his answer, Russell wrote: "This funding will meet the costs arising from the six meetings of the assembly, including the payment of gifts of thanks to members and providing expenses to support members' attendance at assembly meetings, and help where required with childcare or with their caring responsibilities, to ensure that everyone chosen to participate is able to participate in the assembly regardless of their circumstances."
Russell added the £1.37 million will also fund a public awareness campaign to explain the citizens' assembly and what is being discussed, as well as administrative costs.
The cost of the project - first announced by Nicola Sturgeon in April - has been criticised by Scottish Conservatives chief whip Maurice Golden.
He said: "The suspicion among the public is that the citizens' assembly will be nothing but an SNP talking shop for independence.
"The Nationalists have done little to dispel that fear and have hardly been forthcoming about the cost to the taxpayer.
"Given the SNP Government never stops pleading poverty, it's hard to justify this level of spend on such an initiative."
At a public meeting to discuss plans for the citizens' assembly in July, former Labour MEP David Martin, who will co-chair the project, pledged "this is a genuine attempt to have a conversation across the whole of Scottish public opinion and that it will be transparent".
In an attempt to dispel fears the exercise is to increase support for Scottish independence, Martin said he had "unequivocal assurances" from Russell that there will be no political interference in the process as the key issues facing Scotland are explored by participants.
Modelled on the citizens' assemblies held in Ireland ahead of votes on same-sex marriage and abortion, the final report on Scotland's future will be debated at Holyrood, with the Scottish Government obliged to respond and set out any proposed actions within 90 days.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel