THE father of a soldier who died on an “unsafe” Army test march is bringing a civil action for corporate manslaughter against the Ministry of Defence (MoD).
Phillip Hoole announced the move after an inquest into the death of his son, corporal Joshua Hoole, found “very serious” training and planning failings at every level, surrounding the exercise on a hot day in July 2016.
Concluding the inquest yesterday, senior Birmingham coroner Louise Hunt also told the Army she had “grave concerns” about its “ability to learn from previous mistakes”, after similar failings were identified following an SAS selection march in 2013.
Cpl Hoole, described as “fit, capable and determined”, died within an hour of collapsing 400m from the end of an annual fitness test (AFT) at Brecon in Wales on July 19, 2016.
Reacting to the inquest’s narrative conclusion, Hoole said: “I intend to take out a civil action against the MoD for corporate manslaughter.”
The death of 26-year-old Cpl Hoole, from Ecclefechan, near Lockerbie, Dumfries and Galloway, came three years after three Army reservists suffered fatal heat illness during an SAS selection march in the Brecon Beacons. He had previously deployed to Afghanistan and was serving with 1 Rifles.
An inquest into Cpl Hoole’s death heard that soldiers were aware it was to be “the hottest day of the year” and the march time at Dering Lines was brought forward as a result.
Of the 41 soldiers taking part in the march, 18 dropped out, collapsed or were withdrawn – a rate of 42%.
The drop-outs included two who went down with suspected heat injuries, well before Cpl Hoole collapsed.
Rules governing the AFT meant that the exercise should have been stopped once heat illness was suspected and had they done so, the coroner found Cpl Hoole would have lived.
However, Hunt identified failings, including “confusion” about who was in charge of the test march, leading to “wide gaps in management and assessment of the AFT, making it unsafe”.
The exercise’s directing staff were also “unfamiliar” with health and safety and risk assessment rules, had “poor” IT support and no budget of their own, operating a “black market economy”, begging instructors from other units, to bolster numbers.
Captain Colin Nufer, officer in charge of the course, told the inquest he took a “common sense” approach to health and safety.
At a 2015 inquest into the SAS selection march deaths, Hunt concluded there had been a lack of awareness about key health and safety documents, including one called JSP 539.
Highlighting the Army’s “continuing” failure in that field at Cpl Hoole’s inquest, she said: “There was a very serious failure on the part of the Army to ensure the Rifles’ training team were familiar with improvements in JSP 539 and how they applied to the AFT.”
She added: “There was a report to prevent future deaths issued in July 2015 following inquests which specifically raised concerns about lack of awareness of JSP 539.”
Brigadier Christopher Coles, head of the Army’s personnel services group, said: “The MoD has acknowledged that aspects of the policy in place which governed the training Corporal Hoole was undertaking could have been better, and was in areas inconsistent.
“While much work has already been done to address this, we will seek to ensure that it is refined and improved to help ensure a tragedy like Corporal Hoole’s death is not repeated.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here