THE SNP has warned Boris Johnson’s promises are “not worth the paper they are written on” after a leaked document suggested workers’ rights will be ripped up after Brexit.
Europe spokesman Stephen Gethins MP said pledges by the Prime Minister to maintain the employment protections after leaving the EU were nothing more than “empty words” to buy votes for his deal.
The leaked document indicated the Government could seek to diverge away from the bloc’s rules on both workers’ rights and environmental protections after Brexit.
Johnson last week told MPs the UK was committed to “the highest possible standards” on both sets of standards – a stance that helped to convince 19 Labour MPs to back his Withdrawal Agreement Bill at second reading on Tuesday.
But the leaked Department for Exiting the European Union document, obtained by the Financial Times, said the way the political declaration had drafted the workers’ rights and environmental protection commitments left “room for interpretation”.
It is said to boast that “UK negotiators successfully resisted the inclusion of all UK-wide level playing-field rules” in the previous deal negotiated by Theresa May’s team, allowing Britain to compete against EU members by possibly watering down rights.
Gethins said: “Despite all the rhetoric, it’s clear that Boris Johnson and his government are planning to rip up workers’ rights and pursue a post-Brexit race to the bottom on regulations that have maintained key protections for workers.
“Just a week ago Johnson pledged to maintain a level playing field with our EU partners on workers’ rights and environmental protections – today it’s been revealed to be nothing more than empty words in an attempt to buy off votes for his damaging deal. His promises are not worth the paper they are written on.
“We already know Johnson’s plans would be devastating for Scotland - hitting the economy, costing thousands of jobs and harming people’s livelihoods – and this latest government document confirms that Johnson is still intent on going further in downgrading rights and protections that millions of people rely on.”
Gethins said Scotland’s interests have been ignored throughout the Brexit process and Johnson’s plans single out Scotland “for a raw deal”.
He added: “His move to strip away hard-won protections would consign workers across Scotland to further hardship. It is clearer than ever that the only way to properly protect our interests is to become an independent European country – and the people of Scotland must have that choice.”
The UK Government said it has “no intention” of lowering the standards of workers’ rights or environmental protection after Brexit.
DUP leader Arlene Foster yesterday demanded “honesty” from Johnson over Brexit, as she warned that her party will continue to say no to his Brexit deal unless he secures further concessions from Brussels.
At the party conference in Belfast, Foster reflected on Johnson’s speech to the same event last year, when he insisted he would not erect any new economic barriers in the Irish Sea.
She said: “Without change, we will not vote for the Prime Minister’s agreement.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel