A SCOTTISH Tory MSP has been accused of taking a “curmudgeonly approach to democracy” after criticising the cost of the new Citizens’ Assembly.
Speaking at the Scottish Parliament yesterday, Gordon Lindhurst urged the SNP to listen to the electorate rather than choosing to spend money on the assembly, which was set up to discuss the future of the country.
Constitutional Relations
Secretary Mike Russell said that of the £1.37 million earmarked for the assembly, £339,600 had been allocated to making payments to help provide support for members and conveners with travel and subsistence costs.
Members are also provided with a gift of thanks for participating, as well as receiving support with other associated costs such as childcare.
The newly-formed group first met on October 26 and 27.
Lindhurst said: “With the Scottish Parliament already costing over a quarter of a million pounds per day, would it not be better, more democratic and more effective if this SNP government started listening to the Scottish electorate, rather than creating yet another costly group to blame for its failed policies?”
Russell responded: “Well, I regret that curmudgeonly approach to democracy, I have to say.
“I would encourage Mr Lindhurst to meet members of the Citizens’ Assembly and I’m sure that the conveners of the Citizens’ Assembly would be happy to meet with him.
“I had the privilege of so doing on Saturday night in Edinburgh and I was bowled over by their enthusiasm, by their commitment, by their engagement, by their energy about their involvement in Scottish democracy.
“I think that is to be commended and not condemned, and I think the member might like to consider whether what he has said encourages that or discourages participation in democracy.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel