THE Scottish Greens have now bowed out of the election in three of Scotland’s most marginal seats.
The party came under pressure after announcing plans to stand in Perth and North Perthshire, where the SNP’s Pete Wishart is defending a majority of just 21 against the Tories.
Over the weekend local Greens said for a “number of reasons” they wouldn’t stand. The Tories called them “cowardly”.
In North East Fife, Scottish Greens have offered to help campaign for the SNP’s Stephen Gethins who has a majority of just two. LibDem candidate Wendy Chamberlain said it would be a boost for her campaign.
READ MORE: Scottish farmers face a massacre in the next General Election
And the Dundee and Angus association of the Scottish Greens has said it will focus on ousting Angus MP Kirstene Hair, who the party says “has a voting record that stands against everything we are for”.
Yesterday, Wishart told The Courier he was “incredibly grateful” for the Scottish Greens’ decision, adding: “Many voters who support Scottish independence vote Green and I am hoping I can count now on their vote. I hope I can demonstrate to them I am worthy of that vote at Westminster by campaigning for environmental issues on their behalf as an SNP MP.”
A Scottish Tory spokesperson said the Greens were “terrified of upsetting their paymasters”, stating: “The SNP have repeatedly played Patrick Harvie and it is getting embarrassing to watch.”
However, a spokesperson for the Scottish Greens said it would hold Wishart to account for his “oil-industry lobbying”. They went on: “This decision was up to the local branch in Perthshire, who for a number of reasons locally opted not to stand this time.
“Given his record of lobbying for the oil industry, Scottish Greens will demand climate action and hold Pete Wishart to account on his promise to push a green agenda.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel