A LEADING think tank has backed Nicola Sturgeon’s proposal for an oil fund to help Scotland switch to a greener economy.
Business for Scotland (BfS) “warmly welcomed” the First Minister’s announcement that at least £1 billion should be set aside to support a “just transition” for areas where the oil and gas industry is a major employer.
The fund would be ringfenced from £8.5bn in revenues raised by the oil and gas sector over the next five years, based on forecasts from the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR). The money would be channelled to areas such as the north east, Falkirk and Shetland to aid the “transition to new low or no carbon industries”.
BfS founder and chief executive Gordon MacIntyre-Kemp hailed the move in a post on the think tank’s website.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon says North Sea revenue should fund Green switch
He wrote: “For more than six years, Business for Scotland (BfS) has been making the case via our website, articles, reports and directly to the Government for a sovereign oil fund to invest in maximising Scotland’s massive renewable energy potential.
“Therefore, BfS warmly welcomes the SNP’s pledge to create a Net-Zero fund that aims to generate at least £1bn to invest in the North East’s economy.
“Ring-fencing future oil and gas tax revenues in the fund will boost the transition to a net-zero economy in the North East of Scotland, where the local economy has been driven by oil and gas production. This will be a key policy for Scotland’s sustainable energy future and for long term prosperity in the region.”
However, MacIntyre-Kemp also urged Holyrood to challenge Westminster on oil taxation. He pointed out that the £1bn target represented just 10% of the projected revenues and that Westminster-set Petroleum Revenues Tax had dropped from 50% to 0% between 2015 and 2016. And last year, both BP and Shell profits exceeded expectations.
He added: “Both The Scottish and Westminster governments must concede that now is the time to start phasing oil taxation back in and then to ring-fence all of that additional tax revenue to invest in making Scotland and, in particular, the north east the world leader in renewable energy.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel