JUSTICE Secretary Humza Yousaf has said the approach to biometric data in Scottish policing must be “effective, proportionate and ethical”.
Speaking at a meeting of Holyrood’s Justice Committee, Yousaf said new legislation would create the role of a biometrics commissioner in Scotland to oversee the use of new technologies to keep communities safe.
He said he has an “open mind” about whether to extend the responsibilities of the commissioner beyond the current remit of Police Scotland and the Scottish Police Authority (SPA).
Yousaf said: “The Scottish Biometrics Commissioner Bill speaks to some of the key societal issues of our time, touching on human rights and ethics as they relate to police use of very personal information.
“I want to ensure that our approach to biometric data, including new technologies such as facial recognition software, is effective, proportionate and, of course, ethical.
“This bill creates an independent commissioner to advise on these issues and to oversee police policy and practice. My ultimate goal is to keep communities safe while obviously respecting the rights of individuals and improving the accountability of the police.”
Campaigners have suggested the responsibilities of the commissioner should be extended to other criminal justice users, such as the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) and British Transport Police (BTP).
Yousaf said that while he agreed with the role having an initial narrow focus, the prospect of widening the responsibilities of the role should not be off the table.
He added: “The bill is narrow in its scope – specifically to include Police Scotland and SPA – because although biometrics can be used by other public bodies and agencies, the NHS for example, the way it is used in policing is unique.
“I’ve not reached a decision on whether oversight to other policing bodies should be extended or not, so I keep an open mind on that.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel