SERCO'S lock-change evictions of asylum seekers have been ruled lawful by Scotland's highest court.
The company, which is a contractor for the Home Office, had provided free accommodation to 330 asylum seekers in Glasgow but announced it would be issuing eviction notices to them last summer.
The evictions were temporarily paused until this year when the residents reported that their locks had been changed.
While Serco handed its contract to Mears Group in September, the firm continues to provide housing for about 150 people whose applications for asylum have been rejected. The number of those at risk has been reduced as some people were evicted or had their asylum seeker status reinstated.
READ MORE: Glasgow lawyers fight 'illegal' Serco asylum seeker evictions
Around 130 interdicts to delay the removal of the residents were granted by Glasgow Sheriff Court this summer, with courts deciding to wait until the outcome of the appeal was known.
Legal action against the move has been ongoing since summer 2018. But now, after several appeals, the Inner House of the Court of Session has announced that the evictions, without court orders, were lawful.
The Scottish Refugee Council warned that evictions - without court orders - of people in the asylum system will now be legal to carry out.
The organisation said it was "bitterly disappointed" by the decision.
READ MORE: RMT outraged after Serco wins Northern Isles ferries contract
Serco CEO Julia Rogers said the Inner House showed the firm's method was "completely proper and within the law".
She added her firm had been demonised despite it providing millions of pounds in support to people whose asylum applications have been rejected across the UK.
Serco now says it will start to return the properties to their owners "in a considered and sensitive manner".
The Home Office said that if a person has no legal right to be in the UK there is no legal basis to give them support. However it said it would give accommodation and support to people who would be made destitute by the change or be unable to leave the country.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here