Every day until the election we will profile all 59 of Scotland’s contests. Can the SNP hold what they have or win any new seats? James Kelly of ScotGoesPop has the answers
GLASGOW NORTH-EAST
Winner in 2017: Paul Sweeney (Labour)
Another seat that was assumed (albeit on an entirely false premise) to be out of the SNP ’s reach prior to the 2015 landslide was Glasgow North-East. Of the 41 seats held by Labour in Scotland, it was the one the SNP required the biggest swing to take, and even some of the most apocalyptic polls suggested that the national swing wasn’t going to be quite big enough. It seems peculiar in retrospect, but the local MP Willie Bain received a lot of attention in the media as potentially Labour’s last person standing.
What actually happened in the 2015 election is a useful reminder that we shouldn’t expect the swing to be uniform across the country when changes in public opinion are being driven by attitudes to a big constitutional question. Willie Bain didn’t come closer to holding his seat than any of the other Glasgow Labour MPs. He was swept away by a swing that was hugely in excess of the national average – indeed it was the biggest swing in UK General Election history. Paradoxically, the actual sole survivor for Labour was an Edinburgh MP who had been defending a marginal seat. The baseline numbers from the previous election barely seemed to matter – Labour were destined to lose Glasgow North-East because of the large number of Yes voters determined to make a bold statement after indyref.
READ MORE: General Election analysis: Cause for SNP optimism in Orkney and Shetland
READ MORE: Tory advantage over the SNP plummeting in north-east seat
But the commentators who had expected Bain to hold on perhaps felt a sense of belated vindication two years later when the constituency was the only one in Glasgow to be reclaimed by Labour, albeit by a tiny margin with the victory of Paul Sweeney. Did this suggest that as memories of the indyref faded, the old order was gradually reasserting itself and Labour’s particular strength in Glasgow North-East hadn’t been an illusion after all? Well, perhaps, but the reality is that the unexpected Corbyn surge during the 2017 campaign turned all seven of the Glasgow constituencies into marginals, and three of them into coin tosses decided by fewer than 250 votes. The SNP were fortunate that two of the coins came down in their favour, and Glasgow North-East was simply the place where their luck ran out.
None of that seems likely to matter now. Opinion polls suggest the SNP’s Scotland-wide lead over Labour is twice or even three times as high as the 10% gap recorded on polling day in 2017. With Yes voters still Labour’s biggest Achilles’ heel, there’s no reason to expect the pro-SNP swing in Glasgow to fall significantly below the national average, which means that only a dramatic change in the state of play over the course of the campaign can prevent Anne McLaughlin from winning back her old seat, and once again delivering a clean sweep in Glasgow for the SNP.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel