Every day until the election, James Kelly of ScotGoesPop is profiling Scotland’s UK Parliament constituencies
EAST DUNBARTONSHIRE
Winner in 2017: Jo Swinson (LibDems)
TO imagine the psychological impact if the SNP were to depose the new leader of the LibDems in her East Dunbartonshire constituency, all we have to do is cast our minds back to the media’s hysterical reaction when Alex Salmond and Angus Robertson were beaten by the Tories two years ago. If those were the losses that supposedly left independence “dead”, vanquishing Jo Swinson would be the shock that symbolically brings it back to life again.
READ MORE: This is what Jo Swinson's constituents think of her ambitions for No 10
It’s not hard to construct a plausible-sounding case for the SNP being in with a shout. They’ve beaten Swinson, here before, in the 2015 landslide. They currently hold both of the overlapping Scottish Parliament constituencies, and the LibDems are in a dismal fourth place in those seats. In the European elections in May, the SNP comfortably outpolled the LibDems by 35% to 25% in the East Dunbartonshire Council area. And in the most recent elections to the council itself, they narrowly defeated the Tories, with the LibDems a fair distance back in third.
If factors such as tactical voting and Swinson’s personal vote were to be stripped away, it seems highly doubtful that this would be a LibDem seat at all. So how did it ever come to be one? Odd though it may seem, part of the explanation is Charles Kennedy’s decision to vocally oppose the invasion of Iraq.
READ MORE: General Election analysis: SNP on track in Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath
In the first post-Iraq General Election in 2005, voters used the LibDems as a convenient vehicle for punishing Tony Blair’s warmongering, and the party unexpectedly picked up a number of Labour constituencies on big swings. East Dunbartonshire was one of only two in Scotland. As has so often proved the case, once the LibDem genie is out of the bottle in a particular locality the original reason for the breakthrough gradually ceased to matter. Voters tend to be adept at finding a variety of complicated and contradictory reasons for tactically opting to keep a LibDem incumbent, and Swinson’s coalition of support has somehow mutated over the years from being an anti-war vote against Labour to an anti-independence vote against the SNP. But even though a lot of Swinson’s voters are essentially Tories who wouldn’t vote LibDem if this was anything other than a Westminster election, it would be a mistake to think she can’t rely on them. Many Tory supporters these days seem to be anti-SNP partisans first and foremost, and all that matters to them is that Swinson has established herself as the person who can beat the SNP locally.
What might help the SNP would be if the Tories actually run some sort of campaign in support of their own candidate, but on past form they’re much more likely to leave the field clear for Swinson. Bearing in mind that Swinson starts with a 10% lead over the SNP from 2017, that LibDem support nationally seems to have increased significantly since then, and that Swinson can expect the traditional bonus from voters who like the idea of being represented by a party leader, this looks like a very steep mountain for the SNP to climb.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel