Every day until the election, James Kelly of ScotGoesPop is profiling Scotland’s UK Parliament constituencies
BERWICKSHIRE, ROXBURGH AND SELKIRK
Winner in 2017: John Lamont (Conservatives)
Of the many gravity-defying feats the SNP pulled off during their 2015 landslide, Calum Kerr’s victory in Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk was perhaps the most astonishing of the lot. The Borders seat had looked an even tougher proposition than the neighbouring constituency held by David Mundell, but the miracle happened just the same. Reality annoyingly intervened two years later when the Tories easily captured the seat in what is, after all, their natural habitat.
But with Kerr having another crack this year, and in the wake of the SNP topping the Borders popular vote in the European election in May, supporters of independence are daring to dream that a famous triumph might be repeated. Nobody should be under any illusions about how difficult that task is going to be, though. A considerable slice of luck was involved in making the 2015 result possible.
Although the Tories proved to be the SNP’s main rivals, the seat was actually being defended at the time by the Liberal Democrats’ former Cabinet minister Michael Moore, a factor which ensured that Moore’s party kept a significant residual vote share of 19%. Without the advantage of incumbency two years later the LibDem vote melted away to practically nothing, allowing the Tories to completely dominate the Unionist vote and record a formidable vote share of 53%.
Plainly, if that had been the situation in 2015, Calum Kerr’s winning share of 37% would have been woefully insufficient.
READ MORE: General Election analysis: Will Jo Swinson lose East Dunbartonshire?
So if the SNP are to have any chance in December, they won’t only need to recover lost ground themselves, they’ll also need the Tories to go backwards. And realistically, that will have to mean a sizeable Liberal Democrat revival at Tory expense. It’s hard to judge how likely that is to happen, because voters who have previously moved between the LibDems and the Tories may find themselves tugged in two different directions.
On the one hand, John Lamont is by all accounts a popular MP, and holds considerable appeal to moderate voters who in the past were the backbone of the LibDems’ local support. But on the other hand, many of those voters are also pro-European. The constituency’s Leave vote in the 2016 referendum was somewhat higher than the Scottish average at 43%, but there was still a decisive Remain majority, which inescapably means that a significant chunk of Lamont’s coalition of support from last time must be completely at odds with the Tories’ flagship policy at this election. There is, then, just about a plausible scenario in which the Unionist vote could be split between the Tories and the LibDems in a way that gives the SNP enough of an opening. But the path to victory is exceptionally narrow, and the likelihood must be that the Tories will hold on, albeit perhaps with a reduced majority.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel