THE BBC is facing accusations of bias following its Question Time Leaders' Debate amid claims they edited out laughter directed at the Prime Minister.
Boris Johnson, Jeremy Corbyn, Nicola Sturgeon and Jo Swinson took to the stage in a series of separate question and answer sessions with a studio audience on Friday night.
They appeared for 30 minutes each for Q and As, taking questions on Brexit, independence, the economy, racism, political trust and drug deaths.
Clips of the show were later shown by the BBC news programmes with the broadcaster accused of reducing the audience laughter to one of the answers given by Johnson.
The first audience member to question the Prime Minister said: "I’d just like to ask you how important is it for someone in your position of power to always tell the truth?"
In footage broadcast on the Friday night show, the audience can be heard laughing during the applause at the tail end of the question.
However, Twitter users reported less laughter in the footage shown on Saturday's News at One.
When the question is played in full once more, however, the laughter is hardly audible against the applause.
It sparked a fresh bias accusation from users on social media, with one saying the difference in the amount of laughter in the news clip was the type of thing that would happen in Soviet Russia.
The journalist Peter Oborne tweeted: "This kind of thing was normal on state TV in Soviet Russia. Should not happen in a democracy like Britain. The BBC urgently needs to explain itself.”
BBC 1 PM news edited out the audience laughing at Boris Johnson when he was questioned on trust. The key moment of the entire night. This is unforgivable journalism pic.twitter.com/g1EYHenR6R
— Tory Fibs (@ToryFibs) November 23, 2019
Here is the original footage that BBC cut out. You can very clearly hear the audience laughing at Boris Johnson’s trust issues. Trust is central to the election outcome. Erasing this laughter from the clip is shocking BBC pic.twitter.com/AY4fEYS29r
— Tory Fibs (@ToryFibs) November 23, 2019
BBC responded and said the clip was deliberately shortened for timing reasons.
In a post on Twitter, the BBC press office defended its use of the edited clip said: "This clip, which was played in full on the 10 o’clock news last night, was shortened for timing reasons in today’s lunchtime bulletin. We’ve fully covered Boris Johnson’s appearance on the BBC QT special, and the reaction to it, across our outlets."
But many users were quick to comment on the statement issued by the press office.
Scottish financial journalist Ian Fraser tweeted: "This won't do. Removing the laughter gave an utterly false impression of what happened. The laughter was the story."
Meanwhile, the response to the First Minister's response was positive, including by viewers outside Scotland.
Labour supporter Gemma Askham, in Sheffield, tweeted: "The way Nicola Sturgeon answered the question about addiction was brilliant. She was fantastic on Question Time and – not for the first time – I'm very jealous of Scottish people #bbcqt"
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel