THE BBC has admitted it made a “mistake” following accusations that a Question Time clip was cut in a way which edited out laughter directed at the Prime Minister.
The broadcaster said it had cut a clip of Boris Johnson on the BBC’s Question Time leaders’ special on Friday November 22 for a shorter package to be shown on Saturday’s lunchtime bulletin.
In a statement, the BBC accepted that the clip “didn’t reflect the full reaction to Boris Johnson’s answer”.
READ MORE: BBC accused of removing audience laughter at Boris Johnson on Question Time
The full clip, which includes audible laughter, was shown in full on the BBC’s flagship News At 10 programme on the Friday evening.
However, thousands of people have shared a video of the shorter clip on social media, in which no laughter can be heard.
Here is the original footage that BBC cut out. You can very clearly hear the audience laughing at Boris Johnson’s trust issues. Trust is central to the election outcome. Erasing this laughter from the clip is shocking BBC pic.twitter.com/AY4fEYS29r
— Tory Fibs (@ToryFibs) November 23, 2019
The BBC said there was “absolutely no intention to mislead”.
In a statement released on Monday afternoon, the BBC News press team said: “This clip from the BBC’s Question Time special, which was played in full on the News at Ten on Friday evening and on other outlets, was shortened for timing reasons on Saturday’s lunchtime bulletin, to edit out a repetitious phrase from Boris Johnson.
“However, in doing so we also edited out laughter from the audience.
“Although there was absolutely no intention to mislead, we accept that this was a mistake on our part, as it didn’t reflect the full reaction to Boris Johnson’s answer.
“We did not alter the soundtrack or image in any way apart from this edit, contrary to some claims on social media.”
The independent regulator Ofcom confirmed that 46 people had complained about the clip as of 3pm on Monday.
Johnson was taking part in a Question Time special in Sheffield which featured the leaders of the four main political parties and was hosted by Fiona Bruce.
During the programme, in which each leader was quizzed for half an hour by audience members, the Prime Minister refused to apologise over his use of language and defended Tory austerity in the programme.
The Tory PM was asked to apologise and admit he had personally contributed to “racist rhetoric” during his journalistic work.
Bruce challenged him for comparing veiled Muslim women to “letter boxes”, referring to “watermelon smiles” and “flag-waving piccaninnies” and to “tank-topped bum boys”.
Johnson said he “genuinely never intended to cause hurt or pain to anybody and that is my intention”.
But the audience scoffed when he added: “If you go through all my articles with a fine-tooth comb and take out individual phrases, there is no doubt that you can find things that can be made to seem offensive and of course I understand that.”
One junior doctor accused him of “lying to us” as she challenged the Tories’ record on the NHS, while another voter questioned whether he could be trusted.
In his response, Johnson was met with groans when he said the NHS’s demands could only be met when “we get Brexit done”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel