These are the partisan problems at the BBC

On top of this, the BBC finds itself under fire from every political direction – Corbynistas, Scottish independence supporters and right-wing Conservatives.

The media landscape the BBC sits in is profoundly changing. This is an age of multi-platform viewing, of Netflix, Amazon, Apple TV+ and others, and of a younger generation which consumes less terrestrial TV. This raises questions about the sustainability of the BBC and the licence fee.

Philip Schlesinger of Glasgow University observes that the BBC finds itself in “a media space increasingly crowded by new entrants with deep pockets. By comparison, the BBC is hyper-regulated and increasingly under-financed”.

READ MORE: BBC slammed as Boris Johnson dodges Andrew Neil interview

Trouble at this election has to be seen against this backdrop. Boris Johnson was supposed to be interviewed by Laura Kuenssberg before the PM-Andrew Neil non-interview controversy. The BBC told Johnson he couldn’t do Marr unless he also did Neil, which saw him cravenly cave in. The decision to cut the laughter of the Question Time audience when Johnson was asked about truth and the doctored footage of Johnson at the Cenotaph were apparently editing errors. Andrew Marr was ticked off for saying to Priti Patel “I can’t see why you are laughing”, and before that there was the mess over BBC presenter Naga Munchetty reprimanded for saying Donald Trump’s rhetoric was “embedded in racism”.

In a healthy organisation this might not matter, but in today’s climate, ‘‘every editorial error and empty chair for interviews can only fuel conspiracy theories and accusations of deliberate partiality’’ assesses Schlesinger. He believes that there is a particular BBC factor at play, namely that ‘‘the main public service broadcaster suffers especially from the prevalent scepticism about political honesty and credibility, as it is still the main theatre’’, albeit one under increasing challenge.

One underlying factor is the nature of senior management at the corporation headed by director general Tony Hall, who has been responsible for a culture of appeasement and retreat in front of a near-decade of Conservative attacks on it while in government.

READ MORE: Cutting laughter from Question Time meant viewers were misled

One of the biggest mistakes it made was over free TV licences to the over-75s, essentially doing George Osborne’s dirty work for him for Charter renewal. Free TV licences for the over-75s were a Labour policy introduced in 1999 which the Tories passed on to the BBC in 2015. Senior corporation figures have just awoken to the huge cost of this and attempted to reverse it. It is a typical BBC management debacle from beginning to end. The BBC has a London-centric view of Britain that increasingly jars with viewers and listeners. An Ofcom report published last month found that much of the corporation’s output represented ‘‘a white, middle class and London-centric point of view’’.

Too much of the BBC is focused on how London sees the UK and the world. This has always been a problem for UK-wide broadcasters but has become more acute as the UK has grown more divided, unequal and with a political system where Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland march to a different political beat. No longer is there a homogeneous BBC “British” news, but that was always more myth than reality. This criticism transcends the political divide. Whether pro or anti-union, the BBC in the past 20 years has fallen short when it comes to how it portrays the nature of the UK. It has failed in one of the BBC Reithian mantras that “nation shall speak peace unto nation” – the nations in question being the four nations of the UK.

THE real issue is how the political and administrative centre of the UK has failed to understand and reflect the changing dynamics of the UK, and how it has shown itself incapable of moving with the times.

This is despite a BBC “out of London” policy in terms of staff and production, and the opening of MediaCityUK in Salford.

The answer to the BBC’s predicament won’t be found in what it does in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, but in London. Retired businessman Nigel Smith was part of the campaign to get a “Scottish Six” in the late 1990s – an integrated BBC Scottish, UK and international news, blocked by Tony Blair and BBC head, John Birt.

Smith asks: “Why do editors in London routinely fail to contextualise news on the NHS, schools or social policy in England with an appropriate comparison from NI or Scotland or Wales?’’ He thinks that political and BBC failure to understand and to champion change have reinforced each other, commenting: “It is the nightly non-awareness of the rest of the UK which adds a completely avoidable strain to a UK already under political stress.”

One reason the BBC has ended up in this place is more conservatism than conspiracy. As the UK has developed alternative political centres of power in Edinburgh, Cardiff and Belfast, so BBC senior management have consciously failed to reflect this new reality.

READ MORE: BBC apologises for odd decision to use old Johnson wreath footage

In this they are following time honoured BBC tradition of not getting ahead of change. But they have remained committed to portraying a version of Britain that is problematic and represents the political centre’s elite view of the UK.

The inadequacies of the BBC’s take on the UK are legion. There was the 2014 indyref which threw up massive challenges for BBC Scotland, of resources, news and current affairs, and how it portrayed the debate. BBC Scotland had a tendency to interpret the indyref as a constitutional question, and ignore the wider, richer debate about the kind of Scotland people wanted to live in.

IN the last period of the 2014 campaign senior London staff decamped to Scotland to cover one of the biggest stories in UK history. Too many of them came with an attitude of disdain bordering on contempt, thinking how could a nation of five million people dare to become fully independent? As one London-based BBC staffer asked at the time: “Why would anyone want to be like Denmark?”

There followed the 2015 UK election and the seismic victory of the SNP winning decisively in Scotland and becoming the third force at Westminster. The aftermath of 2014-15 provided an opportunity for the BBC to reset its coverage and understand a different union. It didn’t happen.

From 2017 Ofcom became the regulator of the BBC and created guidelines for BBC news as well as commercial broadcasters to try to deal with the fragmented political environment, but this cannot control content and editorial views.

Issues of “balance” and “impartiality” have become contentious, evident in 2014 and 2016. Robert Peston, a BBC staffer for nine years before joining ITV, said of 2016 BBC coverage – “The problem with the BBC, during the campaign, is that it put people on with diametrically opposed views and didn’t give their viewers and listeners any help in assessing which one was the loony and which one was the genius.”

BBC senior personnel have an ideological world view and many people regard it as part of the problem. Andrew Marr put his finger on this when he said in 2006: “The BBC is not impartial, or neutral … It has a liberal bias, not so much a party political bias: it’s better expressed as a cultural liberal bias.”

The BBC has always seen itself as the embodiment of liberal values. Once upon a time these were more uncontested with patrician liberals telling the natives what was in their best interests. As post-war Britain evolved in the 1960s an enlightened, progressive liberalism dared to be experimental and risk-taking. This was the age of BBC investigative journalism, challenging documentaries, and the age of deference collapsing in how politicians were treated.

In the 1980s the political temperature of the UK grew colder and liberalism found it difficult to comprehend Thatcherism or its opponents. As a result, the BBC has never fully recovered its place or sure-footedness. A pivotal element in this has been the inability of the BBC to take stock and change. For example, after the 2014 vote the BBC engaged in no post-campaign analysis – and in London never reflected on how they covered it as a British story. Similarly, despite the June 2015 UK election making it inevitable there would be a Brexit vote, there was no assessment of what the BBC got right and wrong from 2014 and the possible lessons for Brexit. Hence, the BBC were caught out yet again in how it portrayed a divided politics, with truth, facts and ultimately, the British public being the losers.

This brings us to BBC Scotland which this year launched its long-awaited new channel called BBC Scotland. It marked a new era in BBC production and commissioning with some great programmes from drama to documentaries telling some of the untold stories of this nation.

For too long the BBC along with other broadcast media have presented a menu of what filmmaker and academic Eleanor Yule has called unrelenting “cultural miserablism” repackaging to us and selling internationally as a commodity stories of damaged lives, poverty and crime.

THE new BBC channel has been a breath of fresh air, Yule thinks, aiding the representation of Scotland’s “inherent and growing diversity beyond the stark polarities of nostalgic ‘tartanry’ and ‘kailyard’ or the miserablism of ‘Clydesidism’”. But it leaves big questions for BBC Scotland about who it is accountable to and how it becomes more imaginative across more of its output.

READ MORE: SNP shut out by BBC amid Brexit ‘obsession’ and political bias

Eamonn O’Neill of Napier University thinks the BBC’s failure post-indyref was hindered by “a lack of formal internal reflections”, but the good needs to be acknowledged as well as the bad. He says: “Some areas are of a very high standard (Good Morning Scotland on Saturday and Sunday for example). Other areas seem almost comically intent on expensively chasing non-existent younger TV audiences (The Nine)”.

BBC Scotland, according to one seasoned media insider, is “a fiction”: a body which isn’t autonomous and doesn’t make its own decisions, and which at the top is still accountable to London, not Scottish audiences.

The future of the BBC is not in its own hands but that of government, wider changes in broadcasting, and the future direction of politics, society and the UK.

There is a place for a publicly funded broadcaster committed to an ethos of “public service”, but in the near-future that will have to look very different from the BBC of today. This will have to involve a new culture and leadership that replaces the rotten, incompetent senior management of recent years which has taken the BBC into crisis, and not stood up and passionately championed public service broadcasting. Change is coming and the BBC can either embrace it and show leadership – or inevitably have it imposed upon them by others.