THE father of Jack Merritt, 25, who was murdered in the London Bridge terrorist attack, took aim at right-wing news outlets for politicising the tragedy.
David Merritt, who described his son as a "beautiful spirit", called out the Daily Mail and the Daily Express for heavily politicised front pages.
Today's Daily Mail front page read "New blitz on freed jihadis", while the Daily Express read " Boris blitz on freed jihadis begins".
Merrit tweeted a response to the front pages, announced last night on Twitter, saying: "Don’t use my son’s death, and his and his colleague’s photos - to promote your vile propaganda. Jack stood against everything you stand for - hatred, division, ignorance."
Don’t use my son’s death, and his and his colleague’s photos - to promote your vile propaganda. Jack stood against everything you stand for - hatred, division, ignorance. https://t.co/R8LO16lugk
— David Merritt (@butwhatifitsall) December 1, 2019
Since the incident, Merritt has used Twitter to call out "knee-jerk reactions" from politicians and the media.
He said: "I obviously don’t have full facts about the process that led to the attacker being released, but what I can say with certainty is that no one at the event had the slightest inkling that he could or would do something like this. We don’t need knee-jerk reactions.
Thank you Brendan. I obviously don’t have full facts about the process that led to the attacker being released, but what I can say with certainty is that no one at the event had the slightest inkling that he could or would do something like this. We don’t need knee-jerk reactions
— David Merritt (@butwhatifitsall) December 1, 2019
"It’s not lenient policies that are to blame, it’s the destruction of the probation service that is supposed to monitor and supervise prisoners after release, & rehabilitation services. Since 2010 these serviceA [sic] have been cut to the bone. We are all less safe as a result."
It’s not lenient policies that are to blame, it’s the destruction of the probation service that is supposed to monitor and supervise prisoners after release, & rehabilitation services. Since 2010 these serviceA have been cut to the bone. We are all less safe as a result.
— David Merritt (@butwhatifitsall) November 30, 2019
He also said his son, who worked to help rehabilitate prisoners, “would not wish his death to be used as the pretext for more draconian sentences or for detaining people unnecessarily”.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson tries to lay blame for terrorist attack with Labour
Saskia Jones, 23, also died in the attack. Her family described her as someone who had a "great passion" for supporting victims of criminal justice.
The said she was a "funny, kind, positive influence at the centre of many people's lives".
The aftermath of the attack has been fraught with a political blame game, with Boris Johnson saying Labour was responsible for the early release of the attack.
Usman Khan was jailed in 2012 for his part in a plot to bomb high-profile locations including Parliament, and for trying to establish a terrorist training camp in Pakistan.
He was given an indeterminate public protection sentence (IPP) and was told that he would serve at least eight years in prison.
But the IPP sentence, which ends only when the Parole Board considers that an offender no longer poses a risk to the public, was quashed by the Court of Appeal in 2013.
At his appeal, Khan’s legal team claimed that he was a young man whose ambition was to bring sharia law to Pakistan-controlled Kashmir and that it was “highly unrealistic to suppose that the authorities in Pakistan would allow a teenager from Stoke to impose sharia law or run a training school for terrorists”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel