TORY complaints about an ice block stand-in for Boris Johnson in a TV debate have melted away as a watchdog rejected the objections.
Channel 4 used the sculpted block after the Tory leader refused to join its climate debate alongside other political party leaders.
The broadcaster also declined to allow former UK environment secretary Michael Gove – now Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster – to take part in his place.
That prompted an official complaint from the Conservative Party, but yesterday regulator Ofcom poured cold water on the move, saying the prop “was not a representation of the Prime Minister personally” and that “little editorial focus was given to it, either visually or in references made by the presenter or debate participants”.
READ MORE: Patrick Harvie attacks Boris Johnson's debate no-show
In its ruling, Ofcom’s Election Committee said: “Broadcasters have editorial freedom in determining the format of any election debate.
“Depending on the circumstances, they may choose to proceed without having agreed the participation of a particular political party or politician, providing they take steps to ensure the programme complies with our due impartiality and elections rules.
“In this case, the Election Committee concluded that, across the one-hour debate and a subsequent news programme, Channel 4’s use of editorial techniques ensured that the Conservatives’ viewpoint on climate and environmental issues was adequately reflected and given due weight.
It added: “The committee also took into account that the globe ice sculpture was not a representation of the Prime Minister personally and little editorial focus was given to it, either visually or in references made by the presenter or debate participants.
“The committee therefore considered that this programme, including the use of the ice sculpture, did not raise issues warranting further investigation under our due impartiality and elections rules.”
An ice sculpture of the globe with “Conservatives” written on it was placed on a podium in place of the Prime Minister, while another was used for Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage, who also snubbed the event.
Gove turned up at the television studio with the Prime Minister’s father Stanley Johnson, before the debate was due to kick off on Thursday, November 28, but was not permitted to take to the stage.
In a statement, Channel 4 said: “We’re pleased that the committee noted in the decision that Channel 4 had given due weight to the viewpoint of the Conservative Party on climate change and environmental policy.”
The Tories described the ice sculpture as “a provocative partisan stunt” which it claimed would “constitute making a political opinion in its own right” and “suggested wider issues of alleged bias by Channel 4” against the Tories.
But Channel 4 said the sculptures were “a metaphor for the melting of the polar ice caps”.
Ofcom said the broadcaster considered these sculptures were “in no way pejorative of either party leader personally or the party which they represent”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel