ENERGY company Shell has won a court order to prevent activists from boarding installations in the North Sea.
The company secured an interim interdict against Greenpeace at the Court of Session in Edinburgh on Wednesday.
Shell began the action after environmentalists spent the night on its Brent Alpha and Bravo platforms in October to campaign against leaving parts of them in the sea.
The Brent Field is situated 116 miles off the coast of Lerwick, Shetland, midway between the Shetland Isles and the coast of Norway.
A Shell spokesman said: "Shell sought this court order only to prevent protesters breaching the statutory 500-metre safety zones around platforms in the Brent field, putting themselves and Shell staff at risk.
"We wholeheartedly support the right to protest peacefully and safely.
"We're pleased this decision recognises that the existing legal safety zone should be respected by campaigners."
READ MORE: Mossmorran switches to ethane furnaces to reduce flaring
Shell said of the four Brent platforms, only one – Brent Charlie – is now manned, from which Shell staff could be required to give urgent assistance to any protesters in the event of an emergency but this would also put their teams at risk.
Greenpeace International and Greenpeace Netherlands were involved in the court action.
They said the ruling is a "setback" but they will continue to fight against Shell's plans.
Meike Rijksen, a campaigner for Greenpeace Netherlands, said: "Greenpeace has almost 50 years of experience with safe and peaceful protest.
"We strongly believe in the right to protest and will keep defending it.
"Shell can try to shut us up but we will only get louder."
Michelle Jonker-Argueta, legal counsel for Greenpeace International, said: "Currently we are waiting for the written ruling.
"Then we need to thoroughly analyse it before making any decisions about a possible appeal.
"In any event, Greenpeace will get to fight for the right to hold the industry accountable through safe and peaceful protest when the court considers Shell's request for a permanent ban."
Shell previously said it had spent 10 years conducting in-depth research into decommissioning the Brent platforms and its recommendations were the result of more than 300 scientific and technical studies.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here