AIRDRIE AND SHOTTS
Winner in 2017: Neil Gray (SNP)
IF the campaign was going better for Labour in Scotland, a seat that would look much more promising for them is Airdrie and Shotts – one of several hyper-marginal constituencies where they fell just short last time around. The SNP’s Neil Gray is defending a barely there majority of 195 votes, although incredibly that makes it only the fifth most vulnerable SNP seat and only the third most vulnerable to Labour. It’s quite natural that this is tougher terrain for the SNP when Labour poll well because it’s the former stamping ground of heavyweights such as John Smith, Helen Liddell and John Reid (albeit when Smith was MP it had different boundaries).
Prior to the 2015 landslide, the SNP generally underperformed in the constituency compared to their national vote. But everything suddenly changed in the 1994 by-election caused by Smith’s death, when they were able to take advantage of allegations of sectarianism in the local Labour-run district council and came close to what would probably have been considered their most spectacular by-election gain of all time. The after-effects of that contest helped them to retain a higher-than-usual 24% of the vote in the 1997 General Election, but thereafter normal service was resumed and Labour started racking up dauntingly huge majorities again – until an intriguing mini-surge for the SNP against the national trend in 2010 and the rude interruption of an enormous national pro-SNP swing after the indyref.
But the area’s relatively Labour-friendly status is likely to count for little now unless the SNP’s national lead in the polls drops back or proves to be illusory. On current trends Gray can expect to hold the seat for the SNP with a much-increased majority.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel