AN international outcry has erupted after the UK Home Secretary, Priti Patel, joined her US counterparts in demanding that internet companies weaken encryption for users and design digital “back doors” in messaging services to allow security services easier access.
Dozens of concerned groups, including Amnesty International, Index on Censorship, Reporters Without Borders and Open Rights Group (ORG), have raised their concerns in an open letter to the UK, US and Australian governments.
READ MORE: Time Person of the Year prize for activist Greta Thunberg
The UK government suggested that stronger capabilities to monitor private messages would aid the fight against terrorism and child abuse.
However, the ORG said that alternative approaches must be used as the proposed measures would weaken security for every internet user.
It said this attack on encryption formed a pattern of attacks on digital privacy and security by the UK government, after documents leaked last week showed that it wanted to give the US access to NHS records and other personal information, in a “free flow of data” between the two countries.
The letter, co-ordinated by the US-based Open Technology Institute, came after a joint letter from the authorities to Facebook described encrypted communications tools as “lawless spaces”, and urged the company to “remove or delay the deployment of end-to-end encryption protections” on their messaging platforms.
In their letter, concerned bodies warned: “Fulfilling this request would endanger the security and privacy of billions of internet users around the world.
“Proponents of exceptional access have argued that it is possible to build backdoors into encrypted consumer products that somehow let ‘good actors’ gain surreptitious access to encrypted communications, while simultaneously stopping ‘bad actors’ from intercepting those same communications. This technology does not exist. To the contrary, technology companies could not give governments backdoor access to encrypted communications without also weakening the security of critical infrastructure, and the devices and services upon which the national security and intelligence communities themselves rely.
ORG policy director, Javier Ruiz Diaz, said: “The Home Secretary wants to be able to access our private messages in WhatsApp and similar apps, demanding that companies remove the technical protections that keep out fraudsters and other criminals. This is wrong and will make the internet less safe.
“Surveillance measures should be targeted and not built into the apps used by millions of people to talk to their friends and family.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel