SNP MP Joanna Cherry has said she will focus her energies on defending "Scottish democracy from Boris Johnson" in the pursuit of a second independence referendum.
The SNP MP for Edinburgh South West was returned to her seat with 24,830 votes and an 11,982 majority.
She used her victory speech to describe the Prime Minister as "a stranger to the truth, an avoider of scrutiny and a huckster who would sell the NHS to the highest bidder".
Cherry, a QC, spearheaded legal challenges to the UK government's prorogation of Parliament and attempts to leave the EU with no deal on October 31.
READ MORE: Election: Boris Johnson fails to mention Scotland in victory speech
It appeared from her victory speech that she would do the same in an effort to gain a second Scottish independence referendum.
She said: "Across Scotland tonight, constituency after constituency has rejected Boris Johnson's Tory party and they have rejected their message of 'get Brexit done' and they have rejected their message of 'no to indyref2'.
"The result south of the Border is rather different. Scotland now has to decide whether it is time for us to embark on a different journey from the rest of the UK.
"In the last Parliament, I did my best and was at the forefront of the fight to defend British democracy from Boris Johnson.
READ MORE: SNP win election and strengthen indyref2 mandate
"Now it's time for me to switch my energies to defend Scottish democracy from Boris Johnson.
"Please, rest assured I will do that and nothing and no-one will deter me from doing that.
"My message to Westminster is this: Scotland didn't vote for Boris Johnson, Scotland didn't vote for Brexit.
"It's time for Scotland to choose its own future and it's time for a second Scottish independence referendum."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel