Labour can no longer be a party of the status quo on the constitution, one of the party's defeated Scottish MPs has insisted.
Paul Sweeney said the party must look at backing "radical reform" for a more federal United Kingdom.
He spoke out after losing his Glasgow North East seat to the SNP in the General Election.
His comments come after some within Scottish Labour have begun to speak in support of a second Scottish independence referendum.
Councillor Alison Evison, who is the president of the local authority group Cosla, said democracy could be strengthened "by enabling the voice of Scotland to be heard through its formal processes", adding that "that must mean a referendum on independence".
Sweeney said while he did not believe independence would be the best outcome for Scots, "we cannot tolerate the status quo any more".
Speaking on the BBC's Sunday Politics Scotland programme, he said the constitutional issues of independence and Brexit had "bedevilled" the Labour Party.
"We're a party that is set up to deal with class and social justice issues, we're not really set up to deliver a particular binary issue on a constitutional question," he said.
"That has really bedevilled us over the last five years because these two big monumental constitutional issues have really split the Labour vote."
The former MP recalled that in the 1980s and 1990s Labour successfully argued that the "dysfunctional" UK necessitated the creation of the Scottish Parliament.
He added that it was still "quite clear the British state as currently constructed is not sustainable".
Sweeney said: "Certainly a more confederal or federal relationship is something that urgently needs to happen and we need to be galvanised to present an argument that that needs to happen, and the British Government needs to recognise that that is a reality.
"I think we need to develop a clear policy that is actually a form of an ultimatum. We say to the British Government: unless you recognise the body politic at large in Scotland is not willing to accept the current status quo of the British state and has to recognise that there needs to be a major engagement with the Scottish body politic to reform the British state and recognise the difference of opinion in Scotland, the United Kingdom is unsustainable.
"I think we need to present that as an ultimatum, you need to present an option on confederation, radical reform, to make the UK a more federal construct."
Former Scottish Labour leader Kezia Dugdale said the opponents of independence needed to find a new argument for keeping Scotland in the UK.
Dugdale, who stood down as an MSP earlier this year, told No campaigners: "You're wasting precious time arguing about mandates. Last referendum won by persuading centre-left voters 1) EU membership only safe in UK 2) A progressive Labour gov was on the horizon 3) Currency and Economic security.
"Reasons 1 and 2 have melted away and the Yes movement have been working on 3 since 2014.
"You need a new argument for the union which isn't rooted in Queen and country unionism. You need this regardless of whether referendum is next year or in a generation."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel